Search results

You are a ying to someone else's yang.

Ahh.. the justification of anything for the greater good. Have you ever been to Sandford?

Don't remember calling them wankers.. When they stepped in to help out the club they got something for their money remember, it's not like they gave the club the money for free. They chose to decline the club's offer for a 50% share. They chose to sell to Wasps... for less than they were...

So we're back to giving a fuck about the children's charity again. Funny how no-one gave a fuck last October.

Exactly why they will never liquidate the club.

I've raised this point with both the SBT and this new protest group. But the fact is that because it is not the populist view they are not interested. Far too interested in gaining popularity than looking at building any kind of constructive approach. You may well argue that trying to...

With respect I wouldn't trust the Trust with your pound... Never mind tens of millions of them.

The only thing this letter will get is likes and retweets on social media. You would have hoped thst they may have reflected on the fact that the 'you're all a bunch of cunts' approach from the Trust has not worked. If someone wants to challenge SISU properly then take them to task on...

SISU got comprehensively beaten in the JR. That is not a reason to not pursue an investigation of the council's conduct in relation to the ACL issue. They are seperate.

So... If you had a cynical view you may think that the CET have played up the story to quieten down the council dissenters... Just putting it out there.

Didn't Private Eye run an article slating SISU once?? Pretty sure it was talked up as the bastion of good journalism that day.

Wasps offer was conditional wasn't it. The condition being that if you don't sell it to us we will veto and take it anyway.

An administrator has to work under legal framework. Any wrongdoing (which is what was intimated by ACL in their rationale for rejecting the CVA) would mean he would be putting his own livelihood at risk. To suggest such actions took place is a nonsense. There is a huge difference between what is...

Seeing as it was ACL that rejected the CVA causing us a 10point deduction the onus was on them. So either they did not pursue it.. in which case the deduction was done out of spite.... or they did pursue it, and it was all above board.

There are hundreds of thousands of people that have put in public service like that as teachers and nurses. You know the people that actually make a fucking difference to other people's lives. Maybe their achievements should be recognised (which go far beyond hers lets be honest) instead of...

Who wants to start a new team?? Look at the 'fan ownership' at Rushden & Diamonds. And they were given a stadium complex for free. Now they don't exist because the reality is that you can't run a football club on buttons. Unless the club is self sufficient... it's just another version of...

I wouldn't give it up to be honest. The Trust have probably destroyed all ties with the club now.. so someone needs to interact with them at a basic level. Perhaps a more considered approach will get a better response.

The problem is endemic though. If SISU left tomorrow and a new owner rolls up then they will have the same challenges as SISU. No stadium that they own, very few assets and very little way of generating income. So when they get bored of throwing their money away we'll be back at square one...

It is shit. Did you ask the club why? Wondering if they admit it's their fault or whether they blame the manufacturer.

Pinter is a bit too serious.... I prefer upbeat.