Search results

Without his goals, we'd only have 9 less points...

I weren't disagreeing, I said top 4 minimum, I realistically thought autos was realistic, but poor start and us bottling it has cost us this.

WTF! Grendel said top 2!?

So we actually in administration, now then PH4, where are you? Knowing CCFC, for all the excitement amongst a section of the support, it'll only get worse because no one will come in to save us.

2 strikers can equally be isolated as well, people seem to think having 2 strikers makes it A) attacking and B) less isolated. I'll give an example for CCFC this season, Shrewesbury, lets forget they won, they relied on counter-attacking football, and they literally had 8 players behind the ball...

Some of those players will be up there amongst the best for their position; most notably especially Jones, Wilshere and ARGUBLY Walcott at RW, he's doing good ATM. And Rooney obviously is one of the best too. Our team is weak, we need to overhaul the culture of English football and model...

I agree with everything you've said bar on Lampard. For too long we've been saying Gerrard and Lampard can't play together, there're past it etc. I would be happy to see them both dropped, good players, but I think it's time we move on. I'd consider 4-2-3-1 something like this: Hart...

We should be playing 4-4-2, playing 1 striker upfront is negative! :facepalm: Seriously, I don't know why Welbeck was on the wing, nor Milner, none of them are wingers. I don't know why Hodgson is picking older players, if anything, the average age has gone up since Euro '12, not down! So...

I'd rather have SISU in charge at L1 investing in 20-odd players than drop FOUR leagues! What a stupid thing to hope for! I don't want SISU here, and hope PHIV is legit, but I certainly don't want to watch Non-League football!

I don't think it's right, but it may be necessary, and if it works, I won't complain. I wouldn't mind watching a game in Brum.

Young Taylor? C'mon you're only 4 years older than me :p Why can't they offer 100% of profits? So ACL would send an invoice us 100% of the revenue for FFP purposes, but we wouldn't get 100% right? Wouldn't that be illegal and could we get punished for it? Clear this up. I admit, I was...

They offered 80%... 20% short IMO.

If people are willing to travel to Portsmouth and Walsall for away games, refusing to go to a home game away is a bit much. I'll support my team when, where and how I can.

I rest my case. I'm sorry to hear you went to Pompey, that was shitty.

On that basis I take it you don't travel to watch away games? In this context, yes the rent row is about the rental agreement. That example doesn't work, I know BSB liked it just a bit, but it's revenue CCFC make and ACL wouldn't get that if CCFC weren't there, to use your analogy, it'd be...

Highlight the part in that post where I 'backed' Fisher? ... This move, could work, it might not, so I have limited support for it for the time being. We might not even leave the RICOH in the end.

... Which is part of the... Rent agreement :o Don't split hairs.

What are your motives behind not going? If you simply can't go because of the move, then no. If you simply CBA, then yes, actually.

What is it about then, playing staff? Manager? Fundamentally it is about the rent, because we wouldn't be talking about this, admin, Haskell IV, liquidation etc etc. if SISU agreed with the rent.

It was analysing the scenario, gave a balanced view, I said it could be good, could be bad, I don't have the power of hindsight, I just go with what I think will happen, we'll all inevitably come to different conclusion, as we don't have to conform to one view. If you read the post I was...