Search results

it's gone on overpayments on the loan ACL took out to purchase the lease.

I have a feeling that while we ended up getting hammered by Saints (hammered, get it?) if we had beaten them and West Ham won they would have got 2nd not Southampton.

I've got an i20, it's decent enough. Not really a car person and it was a cheap option to get around. If you're driving around town you will struggle to get anywhere near the MPG they claim but I suspect that it true of all manufacturers.

where has it been shown that without the club ACL will run at a loss. You can't just deduct the clubs rent from headline figures and draw that as a conclusion that's far too simplistic. How do you know ACL haven't lost custom due to the stadium bowl being unavailable or organisations not wanting...

some of those figures seem way off and don't seem to take into account how long contracts have to run. Does anyone really see us getting £450K for Murphy or £650K for Billy Edge?!

Remember this time last year when all the players had to sign new contracts, supposedly to support out the wage structure. I would be surprised if this wasn't the point at which the change was made. Maybe we should tweet Bell or one of the players who have left and see if we get an answer!

I would imagine it's a matter of how you get the process started. ACL, or anyone else for that matter, don't have access to the books or internal workings of SISU so while they may be certain something that shouldn't have happened, such has asset stripping, has taken place, compiling enough...

FL should be ashamed, they haven't issued any clear statements and won't answer legitimate questions. Can only lead me to believe they have something to hide. When a group of fans went to their offices last week they refused to even answer the door to them!

any idea who's taking them down, is it the council? surely even Fisher wouldn't bother sending someone round the city taking the ribbons down?

Depends on the results of the investigation but if, for example, they have been asset stripping Ltd then those assets can be returned to Ltd (with the added bonus of possible legal action against Joy and Tim). Once everything is as it should be the sale process could be done again however now...

Not sure people really think that. If the CVA is signed then that's the end of it, we're at Northampton and there's no further investigation into SISU. Refuse the CVA and who knows where we will start the season but the key point would be the management of the club by SISU would be investigated...

The proposed CVA shows an unpaid tax bill and they also haven't paid for their use of the Higgs Centre. Even ignoring that if they have only agreed to pay costs at the ground and the local police say there are further costs unless SISU agree to pay for it why would they pay any bill for it?

I would guess a deal has been made with the FL (as it's their cock up that has allowed players and the golden share to be split between two companies) along the lines of they will allow Otium to takeover as long as everything ends up back in one company. Remember when ACL were going to challenge...

The whole agree the CVA or we liquidate has never made sense to me as there were other offers on the table for Ltd. I don't understand how the administrator can allow assets to be moved from Ltd to Holdings while in administration when there is no guarantee Otium will be the eventual owners of Ltd.

I would guess if nobody will agree to cover the cost then they don't police it in which case the game will be called off due to safety concerns. Came close to happening at Pompey last season, police hadn't been paid and said if they didn't get what they were owed they wouldn't provide policing...

I hadn't noticed the league had taken over ownership[/COLOR] All clubs sites look the same to me, apart from colours. Uniform design and functionality. I imagine the league exert an element of control - which would also keep the costs down for the clubs. The website rights were sold for the...

Remember when there was the fuss about SISU out banners at the Ricoh and we were 'warned' that SISU didn't like bad publicity and would walk away if the protests didn't stop?

Didn't Leeds recently win a court ruling the the club wasn't liable for costs away from the ground? This could be an issue as a lot of people will arrive by train which you would assume would mean extra policing away from the ground. If SISU are refusing to pay maybe Northants police are saying...

lets face it if any of them are remotely decent they will have gone elsewhere by the time we can sign anyone.

same here, I have a few seconds when I first wake up thinking there might be some good news then check twitter to find there's more bad news.