Its an odd one where the football family who want to be seen to police things and the media that give them all the wedge take so much coin from the Betting Industry.
Put It on the other thread re: Leicester who settled for £19m. to complete their purchase ,no exhibition facilities or Land with their deal ,although a resident football club .
Given there Is a current shortfall on CCC outlay of £24M. and the Higgs Investment i would'nt expect SISU valuation to...
Through a Combination Of renting and then A settlement Leicester City Paid £19M. to own theirs ,of Course It does'nt have the associated exhibition facilities ,development land around It ,however It had Its club residinng at the time.
Wierd Ain't It when they reckon on having monies to buy that back for making money and I guess still thinking they could still progress on their share In the Arena at that point,FFS they could'nt even find £6M. for 50% of ACL ,God that bloke was clueless.
Again Lord ,why Is It a problem now If It was'nt to complete the place first time around,secondly why does It matter when they could revert to a simple rental agreement,which Is what they started off with.
I don't get the fixation with the loan ,It was good enough when they used the very same to complete the fooking place.
If The need to they could revert to renting IT.