Search results

I guess the squad in nominal terms is maybe the right size it's just that the number of players we have to the standard we really want is a lower % of that number than it needs to be

Corbyn lost the whip for saying that antisemitism in the Labour party was overstated for political reasons. I don't think that is racism or even false, is it?

Of course it is a positive but it isn't a substitute for squad depth - he apparently chose to answer a question about squad depth with a reference to the medical infrastructure.

Like I said the other day, I'm prepared to wait and see. His front bench though appear very content with a right wing policy platform, in particular the COE and the SoSHSC.

It was obviously a facetious comment. She said Labour has changed, is she hinting at it having changed to the extent that she would be happy to tow the party line now on various issues?

Great player i've heard

I agree with King on the light shows but for different reasons - i'd just say I'd rather spend the money on improving the product the people really come to see than some silly gimmick

Natalie Elphicke must have voted against the Labour whip 100s of times in the past - it's high time she was suspended from the party

Sounds a bit delusional really, with the best will in the world medical staff do not prevent injury. We didn't even have a particularly bad season injuries wise and still struggled a bit, if he can't see that it's quite worrying.

I think so, it's a horrendous reflection on the competitiveness of the league. The target was 40 points back in our day. We got relegated on 34 and think we were 8 points adrift at the end.

It's a big tent isn't it?

Why are Man United letting him go for nothing then?

What did he say about squad depth and heamorrhaging money?

His face and smile is quite like Smashie actually

He's finally got the radio show he'd always coveded

Jesus wept

The choice of players seems indicative

I fancy West Brom in the second leg more than I do Southampton on that showing