Search results

I'm sure we've been through this before but what is now being claimed to be taken out. Looking at the latest accounts (year ending 31 May 2015) there's £5.2m in staff costs (including directors). £4.3m of that was wages. That covers 414 employees of which 105 are players, coaches etc...

These two things may not be unrelated!

Who is? Are they going with something similar or a total change?

Westworlds up there. I'm a huge X-Files fan so loved having that back. Was the OJ Simpson thing this year? Red Dwarf was on form, pretty much all the Marvel shows and Preacher. And Inside No 9 is back next week so I can sneak that in to 2016.

Its not really flashy blockbuster sci-fi. Very dark and moody.

Didn't he stop coming on around the time it was revealed in a council ethics meeting that they'd done deals with the CT to suppress stories after he'd been on here for months claiming it was tin foil hat territory if anyone suggested that had happened. CT lost a lot of respect from me at that...

Surely that will be a landslide, how many non Wasps fans will be bothered to click on a Wasps article?

The problem is the number of people who do. Well actually they don't even read it they see the snarky tweets and Facebook posts and use that as fact.

Kieran said he would be on big money, for L1 anyway, when he signed didn't he. Probably leased and getting a hefty discount in return for doing a bit of advertising for them.

The idea that the CT aren't anti-CCFC is well and truly out of the windows now. We had the comments from Reda and Kieran a while back which showed what they players and staff think of the standard of journalism and what they've been up to today couldn't be any more blatant.

Having a look at their readership and website figures this confrontational approach could be a last throw of the dice. Can't see how they can survive much longer, even in the context of a declining industry they had the fifth largest drop in readership in the last set of figures I could find.

I don't click on the links they post, don't want to give them the traffic. There's another one now

Top of the table!

I can't see one person who is agreeing with the CT, all the tweets are people either angry at them for the way they treat the club or taking the piss but they've spun it into an article about an online storm.

Not taken the CT long

As if the tweet wasn't bad enough there's now a story up on the website. No wonder some of our ex-players have not been exactly complimentary about the CT and the way they treat the club.

Who gives a toss if he's got a new car? If you work for a company who aren't performing well are there supposed to be restrictions in place on what you can spend your wages on?

Doesn't the argument that SISU could have taken legal action which would impact the sale of ACL kind of fall down when ACL was sold when legal action was ongoing anyway?

If he's trying to do that he's come to the wrong place!

On what basis? If you apply for a JR the initial hearing is to see if there is a case to be heard. How on earth would SISU persuade anyone that an open and transparent sales process, done along similar lines to the disposal of assets regulations, required a JR?