Search results

What I'm on about is the fact that our current deal at the Ricoh ends before JR1 is likely to run its course, let alone JR2. If Wasps won't restart talks with CCFC while SISU are engaged with CCC in JR1 or JR2 that will impact the club severely. We will have no choice other than to leave the...

See the its all SISU's fault, no blame on Wasps PR is starting already just in case we do have to leave.

If they think he's too good to be loaned to a L1 side then he'll be playing for them in the championship won't he?

That isn't as it was in response to your post on this specific case. The original post you responded to was general. Any chance of an answer to the question of what you think will happen when the legal action is still ongoing and the current Ricoh deal ends?

I was making a general point not something specific to this case. But still if no talks will take place until legal action ends and that action will run longer than our current agreement what do you think will happen when we have nowhere to play?

So given that letting the legal action run its course will last years beyond the end of our current agreement to play at the Ricoh what do you think will happen when we have nowhere to play?

I thought all the ticket staff were losing their jobs?

would make good business sense, sure everyone will applaud them and support the move.

Is it now a fact that Wasps are going to take us over?

When the inevitable restructure of academy borders takes place to suit Wasps I wouldn't be in the slightest bit surprised to see those impacted take legal action. They will have invested time and money into their setup and won't be happy to let Wasps walk in and just take over.

You'd be looking at more than 3 or 4 a season. How many did we offer contracts this year, 6 wasn't it? So paying fees similar to Jones for 6 players is a big chunk of money to come from somewhere.

We're looking to sign Saul Goodman ;)

So no need for SISU to stop any legal action then.

Presumably then you believe SISU have a very strong case with JR2.

Apologies for the Daily Mail link, was the only one I could find: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3625925/England-s-Euro-2016-football-shirts-Indonesian-factories-workers-just-95p-hour.html

The point at which we moved back was the point at which the status was going to be removed and the club had concluded there was nowhere else possible to base a Cat 2 academy.

Also I'm not sure I'm comfortable with saying action against public bodies and their use of taxpayers money should be called to a halt if a company, not involved in the legal action, but who are in a better position financially say so.

A lot of the kits for the Euro's, including England's Nike kit, are template kits. Do we really think they're going to bother with a bespoke one for us if they can't be bothered to do one for the national side?

But lets say you overheard one of your tenants on the phone to their parents saying they hoped to one day buy the own house. Would then assume they are leaving imminently and get someone else in without asking your existing tenant what their plans are?

From the same Q&A Really needed a follow up question at that point. If they've stopped talks because of a legal action going on but dropping that legal action isn't a requirement to restart talks then what do they want to happen for talks to restart?