Search results

Yeah I don’t disagree as he clearly had no confidence in what he was doing but can’t get round why Kitching has made that ten times worse

You know I don’t mind Collins walking up but why the fuck does Kitching kick it off him.

Marcel Hilssner as he’d have to off fecking played for any opinions to be formed 🤣

AFC Blackburn on the way. As a side note I do sometimes wonder how a phoenix club would have got on. Not well I’d bet seeing the posts on here 😂

Went on the Blackburn forum and thought I had gone back into the past forums on here. Doesn’t help it’s one of the same twats who was here with Sisu “The club is dead to me under these people. I cannot support it anymore. What is there left to support? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. I heard they were...

Misread it at first. Not childhood but never been able to get on board with Ben Wilson. No idea why as clearly a good bloke

Think he’s trying to say he’s not as shite as people make out when he’s confident, not that’s been better than Dovin all along 😂

Could always just make sure to bring a pen and get a program signed

Gus Hamer

To be fair I was a dickhead when it came to Brad earlier on. Think I scape goated him when it was all going to shit in matches this year. Definitely need to shut up on any mistakes and back him at least for the initial run out

Wonder how we can get him performing back to his best. Weird this exact scenario has happened twice over the recent years with Simon Moores spiral in form as well

Good read and fair points regarding Collins, can see him getting the nod here.

Just looked and they’ve only lost twice this year which is mental. Don’t think the result here will define us regardless so hope we can just play without worrying and what will be, will be.

I mean on one hand in regards to Haaland, Man City are a global team. There will be alot of sources trying to get the information. But more importantly why do we need specifics atm. We’ve had it confirmed both are injured. I know we all care about the club and its players but maybe he needs...

I would agree that against Burnley, a 4-3-3 would be the way to go, it’s more so for me that we can change shape to clog teams out and frustrate them. Wednesday is a great example as they struggled to create anything as they focus on the attacking in the transition. Burnley could be one where...

Key word has to be flexibility. Under Lampard, we’ve played three different formations. We’ve played the 4/3/3, 5/3/2 and the 3/4/3. The 4-3-3 and 3-4-3 have been more attacking with a view to keep possession but not an obsession as more then happy to use the width or target forward to go long...

When Lampard came in, think most would have been happy with us being safe mid to top half. Nothing to lose, so let’s just take it one game at a time and try and enjoy it. Once Burnley are done, a lot of games remains where we are favourites to win.

Was thinking and if we were away, would have pushed us into a back three but feel at home we should put them under some pressure or at least try to so. Would go to a more traditional 4-2-3-1, means we can have two DM to protect the back four and the keeper and means we can have Rudoni higher...

Definitely sounds like an agent trying to push both sides for a better deal imo

On the point on same team, think we’ve got to try and get away from the mentality of form picking the players. Obviously you want players on form but think we’ve need to be a bit more pragmatic and picking the right system and players for the game over what worked against a team that in this...