Search results

I think our second goal was a combination of great cross and lost goalkeeper too, he seemed to really struggle with anything in the air. Can we play him every week?

See Mackail-Smith go right over his own face? That looked horrible, spines aren't meant to do that.

Their keeper was a liability the whole game, I thought. I'd have encouraged our players to shoot on sight, at worst he'd flap it out for a corner.

I'm not getting too excited, I did only say playoffs after all. Where's everyone going?

If we get a point at West Ham I reckon we should look into arrangements for the playoff final.

Should have been three too, if Deegan didn't get all excited and have a wonder strike in mind.

I'm at the start of my third season now, having taken us up via the playoffs (beat Leicester in the final) and then squeaking into fourth place in the second season while losing the FA Cup final. Champions League group stage I've drawn Dortmund, Juventus and someone. All fearsome, but I then...

If he was to go in January, I'd see it more as a deadline day sale while we then struggle to replace him in the two hours of window we'd have left. That's the Cov way!

I think if everyone goes into each thread with the philosophy that anyone thinking anything different is a WUM, board member, SISU fanboy, Leicester fan (I'd use 'fester' to really rub it in) or not as real a fan as what I am, everything will just be hunky dory.

Now he's said something we don't agree with let's downplay his role in our FA Cup win too.

I've heard Claus Jorgensen be a CWR guest on a few occasions, and I'm struggling to think why he'd be a special guest. The logic behind their guests tends to be 'has a link to Coventry City'.

I can only assume you're going to similarly question the relevance of every single guest they have on each week from now on if it doesn't coincide with a product or specific date.

You must have the most psychedelic dreams.

When the first instinct is to discredit rather than disagree, there's something wrong there. If there is something suspicious about the timing or circumstance, that's all it is; suspicion. Similarly if I'm quiestioning Richard Key's motives as self-promotion, at the same time I'm also well...

People disagreeing with him isn't the issue, it's the insinuation that it's not even his opinion and he's just been thrust into the limelight as a mindless mouthpiece that I don't like. That's what I'd consider disrespecting the man and his character with little basis (yet).

I'm not trying to be controversial at all, I'm just flabbergasted that even John Sillett isn't beyond character assassination in the name of 'SISU puppet' Anyone disagreeing with Sillett about his views is fine, but to assert that there's a sinister agenda as if it's some kind of fact or that...

Whoever was on would be asked about the boycott. What else would come up on a show about Coventry City that lasts more than 30 seconds? How likely is it that people who were set on boycotting would now think 'well Sillett's not keen, all of a sudden I'm content with SISU'?

Saying he's not keen on a radio show listened to by a relative handful of fans isn't really involvement, and barely counts as a public statement. If he's fronting ticket drives and giving multiple interviews against the boycott that'll be different, but for now it's a fairly innocuous comment...

How can you possibly know what he's trying to do? You're doing little more than making assumptions to undermine him purely because he's saying things you don't want to hear.

Do you not see the irony in saying this while criticising John Sillett for saying something you don't happen to like?