Its very simple. The ticket prices were cut but the attendances didn't rise enough result in less revenue taken. Therefore the club put the prices back up.
If more people had turned up when they were lower they would have stayed low.
I remember the police coming in to my school to do the 'drugs are bad' talk. They got asked about drinking and basically said they couldn't care less about under age drinkers in pubs as long as they weren't causing trouble. That would never be said now.
At least people won't get us mixed up with the other Europeans now. They might mistake us for Argentinian, Haitian, Iraqi, Somali, Sudanese or one of the other countries we now share a passport colour with!
Fair enough. Can't say that has ever registered as an issue in the slightest for me. I'd struggle to tell you anything that was printed on my passport.
I do like the idea of getting your passport stamped when we go to a European country in the future but that's just because I like having stamps...
I know cashflow is the key but can they sustain annual 7 figure losses. Sure it pales in to comparison with football but we all know that for some reason football clubs get treated differently.
Out of interest how much were they losing annually before the Ricoh when they claimed they were about...
No idea what is classed as insider trading. Probably just coincidence but it seems a bit odd for a large amount to hit the market right before this announcement after months of virtually no trading.
Interestingly it looks like there was very little trading of the bonds in recent months until £8m worth were shifted in a couple of days at the end of November. Did the owner(s) of the bonds know bad news was on the way?
Totally theoretical but lets say Joy owned 51% of the bonds and voted no to the amendments. What would happen then? Wasps are in breach and the Ricoh was the security so would that just get handed over?