The "Trust" seem to be firing themselves back up, with support from their old friend Roger at the FSA
They are doing a meet up with the Fulham Trust today at 12pm (I'd day that is a little late!)
Fulham was going to be tough anyway...
But after last night, how do you get that out of the players minds in such a short space of time!?...
I know people may say otherwise, but this is possibly the worst possible game that could follow last night's capitulation.
Anybody know where Fulham...
Similar in my household. Mrs/in laws all Albion fans.
Mocked me on Friday, asking if we enjoyed our 15 mins being top,
I replied that having been given 95million for being relegated they should be embarrassed that they have not been top for the whole time!!!
They had by far the better chances yesterday... away at Bournemouth.... should have had a point at least.
They are creating a lot, and their fans are expecting them to give somebody a pasting if they keep it up.
This will be a very difficult away trip.
That's the thing with this one.
Mel Morris and Derby have been lying and trying to deliberately fiddle the system for a number of years.
Yeah, fans will have a year or so of watching (possibly) Derby in Lg1 - they won't "suffer" - some might enjoy it... its just not what they have been uses...
Not sure of exact details, but there is already a company - CDC or something that is involved in all of this, and has something to do with the ground.
Remember, our administrator sold is back to a different sisu owned company....minus a load of debt....
I posted a few days back that there were rumours of something like this already being talked about on their forums.
Something to do with a clause/charge in a contract related to the company that now owns their stadium - admin triggers an automatic change of ownership to this group - or something...
Did they not change the rules too after Leicester exploited them to write off all debt (without points deductions? - or timing of deductions changing??)
Yeah...doing more reading, seems the "application" triggers the penalty.... but the "charge" in the agreement with MSD (whoever they are) may well see change of ownership without a bidding process???????
Think with ours, Higgs/Council said - we'll put you in admin (not sure how!?).... but (whatever part it was) club said, no we'll do it ourselves, appointed own admins who sold it back to SISU under a different company name, minus the "debt" ???
....it would be pre-admin... so nothing EFL could do.... but would obviously still have original charges still hanging over them.... the apparent 9pts...
Didn't we do it as part OF the admin.... basically appointed our own admins who sold us back to a differently named sisu derivative. SBS+L to Otium entertainment....
The Derby one looks like (although seems complicated) it triggers a forced change but no admin... although looks like that MSD...
Page 11/12 I think - some possible dodgy transfer of company to avoid admin....
https://dcfcfans.uk/topic/38282-notice-to-appoint-administrators/?do=findComment&comment=2200248
There's talk on their forum that the "application" for administration triggers a clause related to a company, MSD (or something- related to stadium ownership) meaning that they automatically take over the club and administration may be avoided....
Sounds very dodgy and contrived.....