Search results

Specifically mentioned in the interview with MR that the short term deal was looking likely.

I have never heard him be so clear on any potential transfer. I wonder if a mix of takeover with the owner saying dont need to sell to invest and potentially a new contract for Vik being affordable at a good level could be on the cards.

I sware they think they are all super smart and we are thick knob heads. It's basically keep beating around the bush until they get pissed off and leave.

They chose to interpret it in the way the did though. The only way they could have got to a debate is if they named individuals when they didn't have all the details of who had been having talks.

It's a strange ask though... there isn't anything wrong with this wording but I'm going to ask you to change it anyway...

Is he shitting in the canal?

Which to be fair shouldn't be reason to tare everything up and start again.

As it stands we have no idea what they asked to change for example could be as low level as going back to the home changing room etc.

I'll get the rope!

The club can't afford to spend more on putting their games on than they were expecting though Pete, before you know it we will be back to 1.2m

Then how can you be so steadfast in Sisu wrong MA right? I can't remember exactly how much CCFC paid to put the game on and relay the pitch but it wouldn't be cheap.

The amount of money that was being shelled out it must have been agreement to defer future rental payments with Wasps or ACL now that could be being reneged on which could really put city in the shit as it would cost way more to put matches on than expected. Why else would you have 2 sides...

You have the pitch but also the costs for the games to be put on. Either way it takes investment away from the club when it shouldn't have been the clubs liability in the first place. That's pretty fucked up in my view.

Not answering this one @GIMOC as it doesn't fit the narrative?

I get that but you can see why SISU would be fucked off swallowing all the cost and not being given a chance to own the thing. Then MA saying oh BTW you need to pay us more in the long term. That's a financial shit sarnie. MA gets to say the deal stays "the same" but it isn't as the club have...

You say the deal is the same as before does that mean CCFC are expected to give up any claim to money they have paid to keep the games on outside of their lease agreement.

Still feel this is down to the cost of re-laying the pitch and potentially any legal action on lost revenue... MA playing hard ball telling Sisu they need to suck it up which may delay them signing a new lease.

I wonder if Sisu have said we paid for the pitch therefore we aren't paying our lease. MA has said that company has gone in to administration talk the the administrators and pay the lease...

Not sure it's quite this stark now we have tightened up at the back. Gyok definitely makes a difference no doubt but with the other talent around him I think we'd still be comfortable rather than in a relegation battle. And obviously no where near the play offs!

Looks to me like a classic case of jump before pushed. May not even have had a pay off as was likely to be let go for potential gross misconduct if some of the allegations were anywhere near true.