Search results

James to me.

They know like we know the council even if they wanted to can't go to this meeting. Before the week of a crucial JR result and have kept a tight lip policy for the last 6 months which seems to have pissed sisu right off as you can imagine. A week today we should know the results ourselves...

Apparently ML stated the reason it has been canceled is because the "council cried off" I mean is this man for real? Date reaarrnage for end of July 25th I think and original tickets are still valid.

Is this known or just saying it for the hell of it? Proof please

Thanks for post 901 you cheeky so and so.

I'm post 900. Yay. 100 to go. Anyway sisu and the council are rubbish?

One thing that has always got me. Why cant ccfc just peppercorn rent themselves without the need for a third party as its just not needed imo. I know the trust has gone but only one way to work that and that is build it back up. If they cant they its goodbye to ccfc and don't bother waiting the...

Ahh I get it, you think SISU can be trusted and are good for the club. Thanks for clearing it up! ps. Damp Squib (Quite clearly light hearted before any solicitors start getting heavy

SISU haven't said no have they?

I'm not so sure its a sideshow. I think its the main show myself but both are opinions. Remember ML said it was a sideshow so probably not true as he said it. I also want back asap and prepare for this new season as it looks a crap league and we could do something. Could.

Nice pun. Yes verdict should be tomorrow but anything is possible with this saga as we know. But typically the judgement handed week before. I think this will have a bearing on the future of ccfc myself or else why hasn't anything been sorted before hand.

Judgement is handed down to parties this week or maybe tomorrow I saw so maybe then we will know more Robo?

Yes judgement will be known to the parties this week so maybe why the rent offer hasn't be commented on just yet?

CW will go. What then? Baker probably told he can go but no one will take him.

Not rules out I see.

Spot on post. Wilson will go and we need 10+ signings of experience and quality.

Very true it thought he looked a good player also but ultimately he failed and cost us a signing and a budget til he was got rid. He wasnt the right mentality and attitude. Add him to the other 3-4 strikers who flopped then signing 3 this summer doesn't look good. Also I am 90% sure Wilson...

You're possible right Robo but then in the letter it clearly states to waiting for the JR so why not offer it before the JR if it didn't matter? But then to offer it Inbetween trial and verdict seems a tad silly. Offer it before or after for me.

Now now. Only 8 players? I thought a team in football was 11. We need a whole new team with back up players. The squad last year was 5 good men short at least. What's worrying me the most is the strikers? How much trouble did we have with strikers last year and he wants 3 this year all...

I still don't know why this was offered now. It makes no sense to me. In the letter the reference is made to waiting for the JR to happen before making this offer but surely the results of the JR are more important and any offer such as this one is redundant til the results. I don't understand...