Search results

Whilst that of course is true, it is not true of EFL clubs above the conference division.

Agree Grendel, so why hang around apart from the perceived court room option.

Have a good day Nick. Over and out.

I do not know exactly as have not seen documented proof but £475k has been suggested to me.

Would love to know why you think JS is hanging around.???

A very long answer required and I have jobs to do but very simply She is only still involved to recoup as much of the initial investment as possible This can happen in 1 of 3 ways 1.Through continued court action 2.Sell CCFC 3.Profit or management charges via CCFC The only realistic...

Management charges

Can I ask you a question first please. Why do you think Joy Seppala is still involved with the club.

I don't think so EBIT. Earnings before profit and tax In my mind that is Operating profit before any exceptional items. Depending on your auditor it depends what you can put " below the line". SISU/Optium are removing money from the club therefore those that choose to spend money with CCFC...

Maybe top 7 in attendances but bottom 5 in turnover/revenues.

If we all agree that SISU/Otium are running CCFC as a business then by giving money to CCFC you are giving money to SISU directly and indirectly. Assuming SISU are trying to make a profit or recover a return on their investment then money given to CCFC supports SISU I have no problem with...

That's why they are in League 2 It's were we will be soon if no investment made in the team Investment in team = better performance on pitch = fans through the turnstiles= increased revenues

Then it's not profit if it doesn't show in the accounts Therefore, he lied again.

What's the difference between "spin" and "lies".

The real problems start when the gems run out Grendel correctly pointed this out last week. All the good local kids are being poached by all the Premier and Championship academies. Only one or two left in the pipeline now.

There will be nobody on the list never mind a long or short list.

Correct !!!

Okay with me but same applies to my post, which was not directed at him. Double standards.

Will be interesting to see if you think above comment is divisive Torchmatic.