Search results

I have never been on, so cant be back on. I tried to log in with an account I created a while ago. Should be read and addressed? With regards to ........

Alright I apologise, I made a mistake. It wasn't you that started it, it was Houdi who made comments about the GMK lot and I responded when you said: Selective quoting is a bit pathetic though.

and the MILF ;)

I did manage to find other threads .......

Edgy - Just saw you posted the question "if not, why not?" thanks! Just been flicking through, it appears that most have said they have signed it with a handful claiming it is anti-sisu! (so why did Nick suggest that they were against it?)

quote of the FUCKING thread!!! Bravo sir!

Are we after signatures amoung a handful who think the wording is incorrect? Or are we after signatures amoung all football fans who believe that the game is losing touch with fans using Coventry as an example?

Hence why it was worded the way it was, to attract ALL football fans, not just Coventry fans.

I just said I tried to get on GMK but couldn't. I was going to ask why people were not signing it.

I didnt suggest it was. I tried to sign in ages ago and it said I hadnt clicked on the email link or something but I never recieved one. Tried to register a new account and that just gave me a blank screen so there is obviously something wrong.

Very true. But moaning appears to be less effort and far more enjoyable for some. The arsenal game was always going to be the same case, but realistically the tickets near enough sold out before general sale so it wasnt "Billy 1 game" who turned up.

So realistically what are the people on GMK doing to get us back home?

Based on comments I have personally recieved that is them saying it. But on here? Obviously me saying it. Just for arguments sake I just tried to log on to GMK to ask this question to find my account has been blocked. Tried to register a new one and it wouldn't let me.

Do you not get it that ALL parties is not good enough for them?

Sorry to be doom and gloom but I think people cant be bothered! To click a link, put in details, go back to your email address click another link is far too much effort for some! The ipad idea is a good one. Stand in the town somewhere and physically sign it for people. All they have to do is...

I think you are wrong. I think some (GMK) are so anti-council they wont stand for anything remotely anti-sisu. LIke I said, they would rather save face.

You can't stop stubborness.

Like I said, our case is unique because it is a row between the council and the club owners. Most others just have issues with the club owners. If people dont want to sign it based on their issues with wording then that is their problem. Some would rather the club come home than bicker about...

It was worded in such a way so that support and signatures could be rallied from all across the Country. Obviously we are the only severe Owner vs. Council case. An independent Inquiry would look at ALL parties.

I know you were. What have I failed to understand here?! I was not directly asking you the questions. But while we are on the subject please explain how it should be made so everybody agrees? Do you see anything wrong with the wording?