Search results

Proof of it being a windup?

Its a normal thing regarding loan deals where players need to play a certain amount of games

(Includes sub appearances)

Its regarding availability, if he was injured or unavailable to play them for a reason outside of football the clause wouldnt come into effect of course

I’ve heard its now up to the player as to whether he’s coming now, agreed a loan fee of 1m, has to feature at least 15 times between now and end of the season, Man City covering all wages unless that clause isnt met then we pay back 75% of his wages to Man City. But as I say ball’s in his court...

The only ones out will be fringe players, it’d be too much too late to sign replacements on top of the 2 already on their way

He will be, he’s going nowhere this window

2-0 O’hare and Wright to score

Yes Im actually not

No, its the same one that told me Sheaf was categorically not for sale and Luton’s “bid” was never a real thing anyways

Oscar Bobb deal is progressing nicely

Get innn, Que Sara Sara wherever we’ll be we’ll be

Nowhere near, it was rumoured to rise up to that but it was under 1m edit: 750,000 and 20% sell on clause and various other add ons

Amad was injured, he was gonna be involved in Manchester United’s first team this season, ETH said it himself and thats why he wasnt going out on loan

You’ll be waiting a while to prove the truth wrong 😉

They’re of a similar quality

No its CAA stellar agency specifically Steve Howson

Should have come here if he wanted a class song

Unless its the difference between promotion and staying in the Championship

Nope mainly a LW that can play RW and CAM and ST