Search results

That's above the minimum requirement of 5 points. I couldn't put 5 points or not lose cos three points wouldn't be enough.

(Woah-Woah) We've got Sheaf and Hamer (Woah-Woah) With Kelly on the bench (Woah-Woah) We give lots of goals away 1-2-3-4! Doesn't have quite the same ring to it.

I've set a reminder for 9pm. Like to make sure I'm settled early before it starts.

Definitely need to pick up results from the next three. Minimum 5 points and not lose any.

So expect Johnson's press conference to be that we're not taking up this vaccine cos we're going to develop our own world beating one, and that in relation to this we've just given an eleventy billion pound contract to a group venture between Serco and G4S to develop and administer it, all...

Actually better than I expected. I'd expected him to dispatch the army to those states that didn't vote for him, have a shoot-on-sight policy for anyone near the White House and declare martial law by now. Mind you, he may have tried and they just refused.

You can't satire Trump - anything you come up with will be much, much saner than the reality.

Nah mate. McAllister retired years ago.

In a way they both tell the same story. They have a high conversion rate because the chances we're giving them are easy ones from our own mistakes. Not like they're taking pot shots from around the area desperately trying to score. They know they'll get the inevitable defensive error leaving...

Depends on where the ball is at the time I guess. If it's out wide and that's where the ref is concentrating while ball is coming over defender jumps, attacker backs in and by the time ref sees it he interprets it as defender climbing on the striker. However with assistants and VAR should be...

Who's to say we wouldn't sell everything that moved if we got relegated now? If players attract attention and can earn more, they're going to want to leave.

Trouble is you go up, some players impress and get bids for. They can earn more and play at a higher level if we go down, so they leave. Then we have to replace them with unknown quantities so IF we go up again we don't know if they'll be able to hack it or not. Rinse and repeat. Only chance...

They're both more clinical, I'm just not sure if those two as a partnership will be creating the same amount of chances. They may be too similar rather than complimentary. Hopefully it'll work as a pairing.

This will be the fun part. Watching them all tear each other to shreds in an attempt to not get eaten themselves. Hopefully many revelations to come on how much of an incompetent, corrupt shitshow all this was.

To be fair they were massively hampered by Mitch and the Rep's blocking/filibustering everything they possibly could regardless. The fact even the massively watered down ACA was made legislation was quite something.

But he wuldn't be an immigrant. He's emigrating dumbass! ;)

Can also keep nice and warm with all those burning crosses too. However, Alaska isn't something Trump does - consent isn't a big thing for him. Just grab 'em by the pussy cos you're famous don't ya know.

Yesterday MR was poor with subs. We were starting to look tired and the balance had swung in their favour. He did nothing. We go behind so he (eventually in injury time) changes the RWB and a CM (taking off one of our better and more creative performers on the day in the process for someone who...

Yep. We're conceding loads of goals so the clear answer is bring in a manager who's sides tend to concede goals.

Would be better to get in a CB IMO. Or a targetman striker. Can't see a new keeper adding much defensively. Not like we're conceding due to crosses - most are from basic errors. Ones from corners are because the zonal marking is shit and not working. Change that to man-to-man and we'd improve...