Search results

Does anyone else remember MR saying last week how he had the opportunity to change things and chose not to and had to learn from that? Nice to see he's really taken that lesson to heart.

We need to change things up. Whether that's Allen and/or O'Hare for Westbrooke/Shipley or bring on Biamou to go two up top and O'Hare just behind not sure, but it's just getting too frenetic.

He comes their second striker.....

As I feared they're far more involved since HT

Encouraging first half but you you're always a bit wary once we hit the break 1-0 up. You're almost expecting them to bring on another striker, us to retreat into our own half and let them come into it. But we shall see.

Is that sending messages via trouser twitches?

Never been interesting in going to watch a theatrical version of it, no chance in hell anyone's going to get me to watch a film version of it.

Personally I'd think if you were going to go above what is currently there you'd leave them in as a placeholder you can add to. Just removing them is far more likely to be because you're just not going to continue with them.

Wasn't part of the problem in the election that if you do neither they both moan at you?

That's your perception of your position. \It's not mine. When you talk about things being twisted, you're twisting what I've said to suit your own perception of what you think I'm doing.

There was a vegan festival type thing at FarGo in the summer my sister attended (who isn't vegan but will substitute meat-free etc for a few meals a week). The different styles of people there were quite staggering. One speaker was moderate and was talking about how it is a right to choose and...

How many have we sold who?

I'll tell you three things for certain, I'm not being Diane Abbott!

Shouldn't that be "how many have we sold I see what you did there" if we're following the conventional telling of knock knock jokes? The punchline needs a bit of work IMO ;)

Very pleased we've got him signed up - early Chrimbo present.

Of course not, but that's the legal side. From a legal perspective I believe they have every right to IDENTITY as a different gender, undergo transition and to do all those other things. But at the same time from the biological standpoint they haven't changed gender - they're relying on hormone...

How many have we sold who?

I could ask why you are constantly having a go at the likes of schmeee, BSB, Tony etc on here having a go at Johnson but leave the likes of Dom, Grendel etc relatively unscathed in comparison? Your criticism of Corbyn and the Labour party on here made me surprised to find out you were...

So if someone has overcome cancer with the help of surgery and chemotherapy etc do we then just ignore that they needed those things to overcome it and just say that person can cure cancer? Without the surgery and drugs those people would still be the sex they were before. This a legal vs...

It is tiresome. His sister could come round your house, tell you to your face she called him Al and you'd accuse her of being put up to it by someone.