Search results

'Red side' wouldn't have me. They'd see me as a traitor for not voting for Corbyn in either of his two elections.

He literally quotes it underneath!

Boris Johnson's sister Rachel admits she has 'never met' his girlfriend Carrie Symonds | Daily Mail Online Taken from a GMB interview after the election. She said it on TV.

I'll give you a clue why. It starts with £ and ends with £.

Literally two weeks ago Jennifer Arcuri said in an interview she referred to him as "Alexander the Great". His sister Rachel in a mail interview said she didn't refer to him as Boris but as Al.

You asked me this same question a few weeks ago and I told you. Alexander is his actual first name and the one he's referred to by friends and family. Boris is a comedic character to do Alexander's dirty work and appeal to the electorate. I've no interest in that character. I'm interested in...

You say that the party needs someone who follows what they believe. Yet you spend much of the rest of it talking about realism in being electable. Left and right wing mentalists follow what they believe. A pragmatist knows you can't win every battle at once and you have to look at those battles...

Having to resort to austerity while simultaneously massively reducing tax rates? If we're that close to bankruptcy you'd have to keep the tax rates out of necessity whilst cutting spending - that is true austerity. Making massive cuts while reducing tax revenues is a choice.

If that were true the question must then be asked - why? Alexander has proven many, many times to not be trustworthy. Far more than Corbyn certainly. A lot fewer people seemed to feel Corbyn was untrustowrthy in 2017 when he was up against May, who is far more trustworthy compared to Johnson.

Because the older people voted Tory they're clearly wiser? There will be an element of experience involved but between 40-50 it starts out of self interest - the body and mind have started to very slowly decline and self interest becomes more important to protect your own assets in fear of...

I think it's the difference in background. From a legal perspective people can change sex, so a judge is going to look at it from that perspective. From a biological perspective humans cannot change sex. There are some species that can (mainly fish and amphibians I believe) and we can't...

So we agree then. The big issue was Brexit, not Corbyn's former associations.

For me the big issue with this is the fact it is looked upon as 'better education' that reduces social mobility and entrenches the sense of entitlement and superiority in those with more means to pay. A thick fucker in private school will be given far more credibility and opportunity via social...

At what point have I suggested Labour 'just carry on'? Missed the point entirely, as you were talking about associations carrying on with you forever. In which case if his 'terrorist sympathising ' was such a massive factor why wasn't it such a massive factor in 2017 when the Conservatives had...

Remind me which party gets the most votes from those with lower qualifications?

Do you ever look at anything other than stuff praising Alexander? Are you in a cult in which he's the leader? His brother quit because he didn't trust him. He's cheated on his wife numerous times (and even cheated on the women he was cheating on his wife with). Even during the election the...

Because he was pro-Remain and Leave painted it as project fear. Who from the leave campaign repeated these? Johnson didn't, Gove didn't, even Farage didn't. All talked about aspects that could be kept. So if this was untrue and they knew it to be untrue shouldn't they all be being investigated?

What like Gove who gave out the phone number for Downing St to a third rate radio interviewer just to deflect from a question? Or a PM who got a British national more time in prison for not paying attention and basically agreeing with what she's been accused of (and who's dad was a trainee spy...

So why didn't he get so massively rejected in 2017? He must've done a lot of terrorist sympathising in the last two years?

It's all very well saying why was austerity brought in, but you have to ask why austerity was brought in at the same time as massively cutting tax rates resulting in a loss to the exchequer that has had to be filled by more borrowing on top of the cuts. Alternatives/compromises were available...