Search results

This aged well.

I think it could be a dangerous restart and absolute carnage. Restart - massive crash - race over

Hamilton most definitely sold his soul to the devil. How can so many other people suffer these kind of problems but almost never him.

As I said I've no problem with someone succeeding with talent and hard-work enjoying wealth from that. As long as they contribute towards society via taxes on that and don't use it to give themselves or their friends/family undeserved benefits/influence elsewhere. Still no answer to the...

Next move to privatise NHS. If she was in charge it'd perform so badly it'd give those wanting it abolished tons of ammunition, blaming the set-up rather than the serial failure at it's head.

That's a hell of a stretch and diversion even for you. I've always said the problem with capitalism is that it's biggest supporters don't have any self control and just take stuff for the sake of having it due to greed, even though it adds nothing to them and it's just they can't bear others...

The tell people he doesn't want to do them and then take the hit on votes or choose to do something else. As being an MP/PM is largely just about being a sales rep for the party/govt then you'd have to be stupid to consider it as a career choice. If you want to effect policy you'd be far better...

And so wouldn't be paid for them if they were a separate contract. Like image rights.

I was at the US Open and once the matches on Arthur Ashe finished I'd go around for a bit to stretch my legs, get something to eat and drink and watch matches on the outer courts until the next one started. Couldn't give a fuck about the interviews. Seemed like I was far from the only one. Both...

They knew that from the start, with signings like Dann, Fox, Westwood and Gunnarsson. Where they fell down was selling the lot for a short one-off gain wen we didn't go straight up. That is the part I hope they've learnt from.

Are the loans not compound interest, in which case doesn't matter if they're paying back the loan or the interest?

But how do we know someone even better never made it because they wanted to avoid that limelight and media intrusion and so decided to quit? Greatest talent the world has even seen ended up being a pen-pusher because of nothing to do with his ability to play the game.

You really can't get the difference between how things ARE and how things COULD BE do you. I get she signed the contract. I get it had these stipulations in them. I get that the organisers were within their rights to kick her out for not doing them. What I'm doing it saying how it could change...

Did she have the right to reject that part of the contract or was it 'sign it or don't play'? Which is co-ercion really. If you enjoyed your job and were really good at it but every single job opportunity to do it stipulated you had to do something you absolutely hated and not particularly...

So let's say Messi and Ronaldo couldn't handle doing interviews and so never became footballers because of it. World misses out on arguably the two greatest players to ever grace a field because of nothing to do with their ability on the field but because they don't like doing the things off it...

No. I understand how it works. What you don't understand is I'm looking at different ways in COULD work. As I pointed out above they could structure it many different ways to feel like less of a burden. It's a fuck you to the players so organisers can bend over backwards for the £££ of the media...

He's in squad contention but not sure about first XI

I agree, but I always feel bad that I'm not picking Borrows who is probably more deserving in terms of service.

Ta for the info.

But we've also seen many cases whereby 'local boy done good' takes over and due to that emotional investment overstretches themselves and the club. It'd be nice to have that, but they'd also need that business brain to know when they couldn't push further without some serious jeopardy involved.