Search results

I know MR has asked to look into why we're getting these injuries, but I'd suggest an obvious place to start is the small squad and the amount of minutes the main players are being forced to play. While the first can pretty much be laid squarely at the door of the owners, the second is largely...

Maybe. But you were disputing the claim that you didn't fawn over him, creating responses that were a bit overly critical. I've just shown you have claimed he's been playing well when the reality didn't match that.

So you could offset that unfairness monetarily with travelling time considered work time (up to say 2-3 hours so people aren't deliberately having jobs with long commutes) and travelling expenses paid and/or a premium for not being able to WFH.

Because you've got it the wrong way round. They get so rich because they're so greedy to start with. Inherited wealth, more just the fact they're brought up to believe they have to have it because the lower orders can't be trusted with money.

Not for the greater good. For his own benefit, his own ego, his own sense of self-importance and his own sense of superiority because of his wealth and upbringing. Maybe in his own head he think that equates to the greater good because he's had that priviliged brainwashing course tht seems to...

Induction for new MP's should be 3-4 months in social housing with only basic UC to pay for their bills.

When people quote increased productivity at the office it's obvious they think the lower orders are workshy slackers who need to be nagged to get anything done, or because they or their mates have big money in commercial property.

Bet if the law was changed that you had to pay people's travel costs to and from home as well as the time spent travelling they'd all suddenly find working from home actually was a great idea and it was ridiculous nobody had done it before. Agree entirely about the background noise. I really...

Also if productivity is increasing while people are at home without needing to be managed that much, it kind of makes their own job a bit redundant, and they don't want that.

To be fair you've been quick to claim he's been amazing. Got this on your spreadsheet? https://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/huddersfield-away.138883/page-4#post-2429925 Saying O'Hare looked on it when he'd had about two touches.

No, but the Downing St parties were. So if legality is the benchmark you're setting people's actions by I guess you want to say bye-bye to quite a few Tories...

You do realise that (thankfully) you aren't everyone? And far more people are paying higher taxes, have hugely increasing costs for basics such as food and energy and are likely to feel squeeze even more in the coming months. If this was France you'd be all over saying what an utter failure it...

#We all wait for a Robins substitute, a Robins substitute, a Robins substitute#

Finally acknowledging these idiots who run the country are not fit for purpose?

Unless you're immortal this will never happen.

Was it such a good night you'd give it a Perfect 10, or just a Happy Hour?

I accept your point - part of the enjoyment for me is that slight rowdiness (though it feels increasingly like it's crossing the line of acceptableness with many behaviour), but I have a slight issue with the priority. The priority should be making it inclusive of everyone, allowing those that...

Certainly, but there's no reason you couldn't have both in the team, especially if we play Kane as a loan striker with three midfielders supporting. With Sterling all the attacking midfielders would play together at club level. So, not including the back four I'd go first choice: Rice...

I was there when Hutch11 started a thread entitled "I was there when..."

I agree. I was always fine with them bringing in a system which benefitted those that go to more games, but that should include all fixtures. As you say, if anything it should slightly favour those going to many home games and season ticket holders because that provides the club with revenue.