Search results

I think it's quite common to choose something that can be checked and shown to not be true because it helps weed out those that won't be taken in by it and so those that spread it are people that can be fooled more easily, and their network is likely to be the same. Basically efficient marketing...

Except with this lot it's "better to let 90% of the population starve or freeze to death so the remaining ten percent can buy a new yacht."

To be fair there may be a second earner contributing (which still makes it very disingenuous), but it's still nothing like the reality for even people that do earn that.

Thing is she's so dense I honestly don't know whether she's lying or genuinely believes that they're capped at £2.5k because she doesn't understand the measure in place.

He says we're pandering to the 0.1%. He's going to be so shocked when he hears what we've been doing economically for God knows how long.

FFY

I've never understood why it's even used at all as the only thing it can possibly do is mislead and lead people into pending more on fuel than they normally would because they think they're covered above £2.5k. It can only be with the intention of being misleading. If it's the rate is capped...

You should stop being so unpatriotic and talking down our economic opportunities. Frankly you deserve to be sacked. ;)

Or are we just a bunch of individuals who all have the same thoughts on the subject? Thoughts which seem to be shared by numerous economists, the BoE and the IMF. I couldn't give a fuck what other people post. Sometimes I will agree with them, sometimes I won't. Some I'll probably agree with...

You can't believe it if you don't understand it.

That's the problem when you have people with this much money - they can buy influence and power to set the narrative. Hence why we've got this almost ingrained belief that taxation is bad but dividends are good.

Are you still talking about football?

Sorry, but I lost the flow of the limerick about halfway through.

In a way it's actually being kind to Truss and Kwarteng in that it assumes they're reasonably intelligent to know this was going to happen. Because the only other option is that they're clueless economic fuckwits...

Bet the angry make-up sex was fantastic though.

But how would this help disband the drug networks? They still control the market as it's an illegal product but with no fear of reprisals from the law arguably more people will be willing to use the drugs. Legalise the drug you've got a far better chance of controlling the market and reducing...

The problem is so much more seems to be expected of left leaning parties to convince voters. It's like if you wanted to make a journey and you've got two options, Tory Trains and Labour Coaches. People instinctively want to choose the train because they see it as being quicker and more...

Being on the wrong side of a vote and being wrong aren't the same thing.

And that's why the world is such a fucking shithole for the vast majority of people, not to mention most of the other species we share the planet with. And it's very different desiring enough to have food in your belly and a roof over your head to saying 'fuck everyone else, I want loads." An...