Search results

I'd hazard a long shot guess that there are more financial considerations to a venue than 'hypothetical crowd x ticket price = kerching'

Bit of a shitty tactic to take someone's quote out of a thread and highlight it all on its own in case you couldn't rabble together enough winged monkeys to do your dirty work.

Come on, they'll all fill up after three shows.

Bagsy Paul Ince!

Wrong about that movie night though, eh?

Are you for real? If you can't take measures to help prevent injury, what is it you think fitness coaches and physios actually do? All of KersleyDig's questions are good.

As a now former ST holder, I got a confirmation email too so they're definitely not just stuffing it with Sixfields-goers.

The thing about the vuvuzelas though is that they were incessant in South Africa as they were in the stadium and picked up by the mics. A relatively minor disturbance outside the ground could fairly easily be toned down by Sky's sound bods. To guarantee a nuisance it'd really need to be done inside.

I don't really get this part: Won't it be obvious what the noise is when the hill overlooks the entire ground?

Oh right, I was thinking it'd say 'match played in temporary groundshare location' or something.

I've recently started playing squash. It's a bit frantic but a lot of fun with it.

F*** the police comin' straight from the underground A young team playing in another town And not the proper city so police think they have the authority to screw a minority

These song lyrics just get more avant garde.

Easy come, easy go, will you let me go to the game? Bismillah! No, we will not let you go. (Let him go!) Bismillah! We will not let you go. (Let him go!) Bismillah! We will not let you go. (Let me go) Will not let you go. (Let me go) Will not let you go. (Never, never, never let me go) Ah. No...

I'm the scatman Ski bi di bi di do bap do Do bam do Bada bwi ba ba bada bo Baba ba da bo Bwi ba ba ba do [x2] Let's go back to the Ricoh

Feel free. Most people weren't dead against it so much as ambivalent, and certainly not any vast majority of naysayers hurling criticism your way.

That thread contains plenty of posts mocking it, but a lot of that is repetition from a small number of people. The idea that most people were slagging off anyone going is a vast exaggeration. A lot more people who weren't convinced were either saying 'not for me' or suggesting alternatives...

I suspect he said the crowds will rush back for the sake of posturing rather than actually believing or predicting it. It made for a nice soundbite that could be quoted.

Doesn't count for me, it's not a proper home game. In years to come that stat will have a little asterisk and explanation next to it.

That's not even close to true, is it?