Search results

I genuinely don't see any ganging up or attacking. I don't write stuff on here because it's a pile on - I write it because I believe it and I think the same is true of others. It's individuals making the same points because they have similar beliefs. And it's largely written as debate -...

Gary MacCheeseery?

Don't think it's going to catch on. Not as snappy as Solihull Messi.

I'd give your right one for it to carry on for the rest of the season!

Fair enough. I agree that it wouldn't be a vote winner, even though I think it would be a policy that would be better for the U.K. overall if we could rejoin on similar terms. Many of those that voted leave last time will either still have the same perceptions on whatever it was they didn't...

I know they would, but we also have to accept that it causes a lot of problems and is restricting the number of seats available, so we make less revenue while having to spend more on policing it. At HR you never had that problem in the area right next to the away fans in the north stand, as the...

If it were me I'd be using it as a marketing ploy. Make these changes but then soon after reprint them with the original texts. Could see them sell quite a few original texts afterwards as people make a 'protest' and to show their feeling.

It's what I'd do to try and move them. Also where I'd consider putting the safe standing should it ever be given approval. Then match that with strict measures regarding going in the corner without a ticket and standing in any area other than designated standing to stop them buying the cheaper...

So using your argument about manifesto's mentioning rejoining the EU not being a vote winner, if the public didn't want Maastricht surely at least one of them would have taken the plunge to say they weren't going to do it? So as they all did put it in, every single one must have been confident...

Not happy with what it had become or unhappy at what they perceived/had been led to believe it had become?

Even though it's highly unlikely we'll be getting big fees to spend, even if he let us have a majority of transfer fees that would be a big difference. Also if has been stated no interest is being charged then again that makes a big difference in the balance sheet.

I think the lower areas the view is quite poor as you can't see as much of the game, but you do feel a bit closer to the action. Most expensive bit should be halfway line, around about level with the vomitories. Decent view and much more convenient,

If you do prices for parts of the stadium wouldn't singers corner have to become the most expensive given how it's the one that everyone seems to want to be in? Given it's also the most problematic area extra cost would be spent on the extra stewarding and policing that area requires. Probably...

Don't know all of the games but the ones I attended: Japan Women v Canada Women 14,119 Sweden Women v SA women 18,290 (both games followed each other) GB women v Canada Women 28,828 Canada women v France women (bronze medal) 12,645

Indeed, and I hope he can remain injury free both for his and our sakes. He could be a very useful player over that contract. But it doesn't change the fact that up to now he has regularly suffered injuries and it's not unfair to say offering someone with that record a long term deal is a risk...

His injury record

Not even worth a squad place in Grendel's spreadsheet.

It's more if you play two and O'Hare is fit, who plays. For me as a general rule it's Allen against the better teams and away from home, Palmer against the poorer teams and at home.

As a general rule, yes, but in positions of power both are fucking awful. Basically the question is Truss v Johnson.

Of course he's not going to be totally squeaky clean. Everyone who gets into a position like that has made deals somewhere and owes somebody. Will he be saying shit he doesn't believe because thinktanks/advisors believe it will get votes - of course he will. But to be just as corrupt as...