Amazing that on another thread you were arguing that you can't say a current manager is better or worse than old ones because it's different times, yet now you think it's totally fine to categorically state a certain player is definitely more deserving of an accolade despite the two playing...
So it seems the people who don't value customer service are the companies, seeing as they're only willing to pay a minimum wage for it. If they felt it was hugely important to get those type of people in they'd pay for them.
If our current average is 19,940, we need a crowd of 21,320 to take that over 20k average.
Going by sales it's likely to end up an average of around 20,300.
It's Brum so we'll probably control the game and end up 0-0.
Think Gyok will be on a mission after the last game, which could either be great and he destroys them or he's selfish and starts throwing himself to the floor and whining at the ref.
Personally I think a team should be able to field whichever players are on their books they like.
It's always a lottery. We could play a team with all their first teamers available but a close rival play them a few weeks later with a few missing due to injury and suspension.
What if you look...
I agree.
With a different strike partner doing the donkey work and leaving him free to poach in the box, Godden could make an impact and get a decent amount of goals (in the Championship). But Gyokeres isn't the person to do that for him and no way would you pick Godden over him. So if Godden...
To the same extent Robbins supported Hill? When did we pay a world record fee for a player under MR? Or did we sell a first team mainstay to pay for some grass? Really supportive!
I'm not saying he didn't, or that he is indeed a great manager. I just think on the pitch MR would have achieved more with less if we went up. Yes they may be different eras, but arguably it's harder now to get into that promotion race for the top flight with things like parachute payments and...
And who was responsible for that fiasco?
I'm not saying others haven't had difficulties to deal with, I just think JH probably had one of the best times to be a manager with a chairman who was supportive.
I agree with all that, but when considering whether they were the best manager really the only thing that matters is how the team have done on the pitch.
Grendel i right to point out things like play-offs didn't exist, but at the same time Robins hasn't had anywhere near the support that Hill...
Still prefer a Mount Rushmore style Hill, Sillett, Curtis and Robins.
If Sillett is going to be alongside one other it has to be Curtis, and it has to be the image of the two of them holding the cup. Simple as that.