Search results

A challenging question is still valid irrespective of the persuasion of who's asking it. The Govt has got so much wrong. They panicked about hospital beds that they cheerfully sent untested CV positive cases back to unprepared care homes which has killed thousands. However, no one involved...

Do you not think they're reasonable questions to ask? He admitted that the CV predictions were based on 13yo flu code... Seems to me like he's had a history of wildly overestimating potential impacts. We should have just protected the vulnerable at all costs. The failure to protect care homes...

Suspect he'd have been discredited sooner or later - Six questions that Neil Ferguson should be asked | The Spectator Seems like his little head has about as much good judgement as his big head...

Maybe if they grabbed each others bollocks less, they'd be allowed to start sooner...

'The offer of 1000 tickets per year is laughable. They're playing in front of 8-9000 people in a 33000 stadium. It's not something that's hard to offer when you've already got thousands of empty seats.' Now that's a burn...

Does seem a bit like the collapse of ITV Digital... Remembering: When ITV Digital Collapsed (article is from 2016 with grave concerns about the current TV deal...)

30th June is the key date. If they do restart they'll need to complete by then.

Always wanted to shoe-horn something from the Impossible Job into a reply. ' 'I'm a metre, I'm a metre!'...

Couple of new-ish post-punk bands; Talk Show and loving this by Do Nothing -

How Wrong Were the Models and Why? Obviously written from an economic perspective but I think makes reasonable challenges to the modelling. Interesting that Prof Ferguson was involved in the mad cow modelling as well.

Colchester's owner owned Jobserve so isn't short of a bob or two. They'll be a lot of owners with less cash to shore up their clubs.

'That's what he said' doesn't really work...

I think the two camps are actually those that fawn over Hoffman's every word and everyone else...

It's not like the EFL have their financial house in order anyway...

'We find ourselves in a situation where there's no money coming in, but there’s still money going out. It’s a basic rule of economics that your ins have to be more than your outs.' - Andy Pilley - who spent £128 on wages for every £100 Fleetwood received even before CV.

I think the original comment was how to troll Notts Forest fans rather than serious post on naming conventions. Works a treat in my experience...

^ I suspect that too. By putting it out as a vote, they already know which way it'll go as it's in the interest of 75% of clubs to end it now.

The EFL saw the backlash from the lower National Leagues when they arbitrarily voided the season, so they decided to separate the questions. As we get closer to 30th June, I think the players' contractual situation has forced the clubs' hands. Clubs with nothing to play for aren't going to...

It's clever by the EFL as it enables them to avoid making one difficult decision.

Remember any vote is only regarding playing the remaining fixtures. What happens to promotion/relegation will be decided separately.