Search results

<p> Because it will force sisu to abandon plans to build a ground outside the city too small for our needs.

Maybe your right. It will be a distraction from the impending relegation I suppose.

You missed out Coventry North Regeneration (CNR). I just love them so much.

Only big clubs like Barnsley and Millwall get to complete in the 3rd round normally.

Perhaps it will become like the standard-triumph club in Tile Hill. The organisation that led to its beginnings has gone, but it keeps going.

Attended all but weeknight games.

Think he has also posted this more recently but I couldn't find it. http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/17194-Paul-Fletchers-comments?highlight=higgs According to the 2003 accounts CCFC Holdings accounts the club had a net investment of £4.8m in the joint venture with the Council. This...

<p> So what income will this new stadium have? There will be no concerts, no conferences, they will all continue to be held at the Ricoh. It will only be matchday income, how many pies do you think we will need to sell for that promotion push?

<p> Oldskyblue58 posted his analysis on here. Showed who put what in.

<p> I would have no problem with the club buying it for what it cost (adjusting for inflation of course).

All parties put in a lot more than ccfc.

Ill sign any petition going, and they wont be getting a penny of my money.

If this is a serious plan, then I think the opening of the new ground will be a blue square premier game.

Well done.

If sisu buy back Ltd, what happens to the lease with acl? Could acl go after the rent for the next 50 years?

For a start Yorkshire bank would have most probably took over and all rent negotiations would have been called off, and secondly, I would care if people lost their jobs employed by a company that had done no wrong. Do you have a conscience?

I'm sure everyone would like a lower rent, but acl has a £14m mortgage to pay, how else will that get paid? I doubt that most clubs would try and bankrupt their landlord (do you think nuneaton are happy about being potentially homeless?), but let's assume they did, that still doesn't make it...

I don't agree with your opinions of acl, but let's assume your right, should we have fans not have put pressure on them? Its the fans that only care about what happens on the pitch that's the problem with this club. We have trusted successive owners to do the right thing, we've assumed that...

Ferret, grendel, covmark, inside track, can one of please explain how acl are responsible for £69m of debt?

<p> Acl will look after it, its their responsibility. Are you saying anyone who doesn't fill their ground runs the risk of it falling down?