Search results

Not been discussed but its almost printed that if they did it would be a big fat no.

As I said earlier, the idea of a new stadium and what SISU have so far presented us are different things. I'd hope if we ever got new owners who could show they were serious about building a new stadium, then all fans would get behind it. The council would also be doing everything to...

Can't we just make £5 million though in shirt sales to make up for the lack of stadium revenues?

The idea of a new stadium and the credibility of what SISU have so far propsed are different things. What we need now is a a new owner with a real ambition of building a new stadium in Coventry, won't happen though.

Now we know where we stand right? Ricoh long term is untenable under the current arrangement.

...football club http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/derek-richardson-wasps-owner-rules-9055299 he owner of Premiership rugby side Wasps has told the Telegraph he has no interest in owning Coventry City FC. Ever since Wasps owner Derek Richardson completed the purchase of the...

54 will be enough, 52 and our GD should be enough. 51 possibly enough but my gut says it won't

tbf whilst I wouldn't jump at the prospect it would still probably be better than our current predicament Unambitious owners who have no stadium and no principles or Owners who own a stadium in Coventry, have shown ambition over the last 4 months but also have no principles

I might have to read it again but I'm sure it said they would only play games on the Friday if we didn't have a home fixture that weekend.

Clearly the club shop and merchandise stand is running far below the standards that would be considered adequate. But even if it was, it isn't enough, its like opening up a lemonade stand to allow you to put down a deposit on a house.

'He's one of our own, he's one of our own, Callum Wilson, he's one of our own. Cherries Army! Cherries Army! Cherries Army!'

So you didn't think it was a permanent move then? Thought you just said it was a permanent move?

That is what they wanted you to believe, that they had no intention of returning to the Ricoh (unless owners). Seems you lapped it up and are an easy target to be fed bullshit from several parties.

You sometimes say weird things like you believe Wasps should change the colour of the seating, then cite the new stadium as the reason yet you've just said you don't think it is happening. Then when I said by changing the seating you risk upsetting some of there new fan base (and target fan...

Sixfields was never going to permanent, in what world does it make sense to permanently move to a location where only 1-2k turn up?

When the our deal is finished does anyone actually think the club will still have priority on fixtures? The club have been tossed aside into the flowing rapids here

So by my reckoning we've got to make another 5 mill, taking our total revenue to around 15 million. Which would take our commercial revenue up to 7 million all without access to stadium revenues. Better get promoting them half an half Wasps/CCFC scarves.

If you assume 5 million was media revenue in line with the other clubs then that means 5.5 million approx. was from ticket sales and commercial revenue.

Has anyone actually seen our accounts from the championship relegation year considering they were filed about 12 months late? All I've seen is that our total revenue was approx 10.5 million, for all we know 5 million (or close) of that COULD have came from commercial revenues could it have not...

No way we'd average over 20k in the championship now, I'm not even convinced we'd beat our 15k when we got relegated.