Search results

That's not what I'm saying, they may well sell but if you know anything about the player he'll go for millions & have much bigger suitors than us - he's been watched by Premier League teams for a while.

Credit where it's due then (y) Still irks that they're the go to when it's just 5 people representing nobody other than themselves & they're generally totally out of step with the majority of fans.

Of course but at least the owners are prepared to engage with our representatives, the likes of the Trust & the Telegraph burned their bridges there. So far everything Boddy & Seppala told us has been on the level (read back the notes from the February meeting) so it's important to keep the...

There is a less than 0% chance of Travis coming to us.

The style of football stadia like Highfield Road when they were just nestled away in the middle of a housing estate then suddenly appearing as if out of nowhere was magical for me as a kid. Nowadays they're largely just huge ugly bowls at Retail Parks & similar, all of that magic is lost.

He's been superb at Luton & a major factor in their upturn in fortunes. Young, commanding Centre Back who can also play a bit - certainly fits our model.

Typical Arsenal that, look like they're making great strides, beating the top 2 teams in the country then failing to turn up against one of their weaker opponents.

He did stop being used as a Wing Back in favour of Golbourne & was moved further forward.

Well that is a turn up. Definitely strengthened a position we needed &, as with majority of recent deals, we know he's been watched for a really long time so as always trust MR & the recruitment team.

Which is why the statement covers all bases. If it just referred to the indemnity then it would imply we're ok with other things that don't make commercial sense for the club; Break clauses, excessive rent increases or maintenance & upkeep costs etc etc.

That's how it's expanded, extra seats added in the corners.

Understand where you're coming from but through my work I'm actually involved with a couple of the projects & there is no talk of delaying. There will be minimum of £130m worth of projects delivered next year & new planning applications are still being submitted.

Warwick is one of the fastest developing Universities around with loads of multi million pound works already ongoing & upcoming. Not sure they'd need to invent a stadium story.

Arguably yes but it's not going to be a carbon copy. @mark82 & @Sky Blue Pete may correct me but I think that was mooted as a style of stadium; i.e. Modular, 4 proper stands rather than a bowl etc.

Fully understand scepticism but as most have said Warwick Uni are no mugs & everything we know so far is totally in keeping with what Joy & Dave told Mark & Pete back in February including the 5 year rent deal etc...

Perfect (y) Expect a skeptical one from the Trust some time in the next 2 weeks :LOL:

Rumour from Dawkins & others is that Ryton's sale has already been agreed.

You've just quoted me with questions then agreed with everything I said? :unsure:

Indeed, and why would we pay out to replace him when, barring injury, he'll almost never play? Not the cleverest use of our budget. If Marosi picks up an injury we'd almost certainly loan a goalkeeper in.