Search results

I lost it a while ago unfortunately. Loyalty was what kept me going, now that has been thrown back at me. I will just go and watch the Blaze from now on, they make it clear how thankful they are to the supporters.

Dodged the question about who would own a new ground.

Because he doesn't answer them anyway.

He's talking crap again. One minute he says money has been spent on players, next he says transfers are break even.

He's not answering any questions.

Its by road.

According to Google maps, St Andrews is 23 miles from the Ricoh, The Banks is 27 miles and the Hawthorns is 28 miles.

Don't tar us all with that slur! After listening to the baffoon last night I'm more determined that ever to be rid of sisu.

The thing is though once he leaves the Ricoh he can no longer blame them for anything. Any future relegations will be down to him.

Because he is probably asking in a hypothetical way, which any of us could do. Otherwise there would be no reason at all why he couldn't already have permission.

He might well have already done so, but he can't announce it yet as he doesn't control the football club.

He accused acl of refusing to deal, yet he had an offer to meet with acl last night but refused. Why would he do this?

Yes he said that. Three grounds in the West Midlands. I think Walsall, Birmingham and ?

No. Despite what he suggests, he is not currently authorised to announce it as he doesn't control the club.

<p> He needs to publish those letters and acl need to publish the meeting minutes.

So you think losing thousands of fans, taking club debt up to at least £100m and moving to a shed of a ground is worth it for £600k a year?

<p> I hope your right. It was either that or walkies time.