Search results

It would have to be scheduled around the football fixtures but I imagine Wycombe would have had to have a very good reason to say no if there was no football fixture being played that day. The situation at Wycombe was muddied further as for a while Wycombe and Wasps were owned by the same person.

It does seem to have twisted and warped some people beyond any sense of reason or rational.

It is because Wasps want an extra rest day between fixtures

Not very scientific but there was a poll on the wasps forum not long ago and the result I believe was they wanted it to stay on Sunday. The reason Wasps want to move it is because they want an extra rest day between matches.

Just another CCFC hater

Its going to be alternating weekends, so Wasps are going to schedule there matches for a Saturday when we have an away match.

Gutted!

Yea I don't really believe what I typed there, was just making a point.

Do they really know whats going on though? Or are Fisher and Waggot just trotting out whatever they have been told to say? Maybe when they told us (can't remember who said it) that the site for the new stadium was 3 weeks away they genuinely believed that as that is what they had been told...

Yes it is my opinion that she wasn't telling the truth also, some people though still believe she was telling what she thought to be the truth at the time

No I can't say with 100% certainty, however its an easy cop out just to avoid it all together then. On the balance of probability she knew. You could offer the same defence of the lies Fisher/Waggot and Labovitch have told and you'd be laughed at and ridiculed.

Ok and I am right, thats what I already knew. :wave: I've based my view on reading your posts on here over the last few years and you've failed to disprove it.

Yes perhaps they shouldn't, I wonder who it was who made it public to begin with. Was it Rangers, Newcastle or the player himself? Whether it was malicious or not it could have the same impact. He's already had to deny he had hepatitis c, however that was started it probably didn't have...

Yes that is right, I accuse you of only blaming SISU and seeing no ill in the council. You have said nothing in post #349 that convinces me otherwise, which is what reaffirms my view that I am correct. Its not what you have said, but that you have failed to come up with a reasonable response...

It was your lack of a reasonable argument to dispute my claim, you just started babbling on about how you care about the club which I never questioned. Your response barely even addressed the points I had made, the closest you came to addressing the point was saying you don't support CCC. Lets...

Come off it, you believe its possible that ACL lied to her and allowed her to make false statements without any consequences when the truth came out. Like I said, the balance of probability says she knew.

I obviously misconstrued the meaning of absolutely anything whatsoever, like I said totally my fault. Yes your response failed to convince me that my claim was incorrect, which in turn convinces me more that my claim is correct. That is what I meant when I said reaffirmed, if that is something...

No as usual it is not aimed at you, it was a response to MMM. However do you believe that she is that incompetent that she made statement to the media without checking her facts? The balance of probability is that she knew she was deceiving the public when she made that statement.

I said the responses, I was including Italia and jack in that statement. You said point me to anything? I didn't realise by anything you meant something within the last few hours. Totally my fault there. You haven't exactly denied it very convincingly, you started going on about how you care...