Search results

Not really. Yes, Bielik's quality is irreplaceable, but despite not paying wages & being under an embargo recently they've found the budget to go out & sign 5 new players - we don't have that luxury. You can also obviously add Sheaf, Thompson, Wilson & McFadz to our unavailable list.

Not necessarily that, more pointing out that if we hadn't brought somebody decent in for that position you'd have even more people moaning. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Do you still think our injury problems aren't that bad?

Refer back to the thread when Kelly got injured, almost everyone that commented here said it was essential we got somebody in for that role. We did exactly that & signed a player of far higher calibre than anyone expected & some are still not happy...

Exactly.

That our strikers have been injured? That he's played nearly double the amount of minutes & taken double the amount of shots as his nearest rival?

Yep, I said this at the weekend when he got stretchered off. Massive blow to them, one of the best players in the league.

He hasn't started a game, getting last 20mins off the bench each time.

We wouldn't want it any other way 😆

Yet we beat them comfortably. Looooong way to go yet, chill.

Not all of them, no and those that are it's practically the first time this season that's been the case. There's 19 games left & I'd argue that's not sustainable & if by some miracle it is that will drag other teams into the mire. Anybody in the bottom half stands a chance of going down, we're...

Have you not heard, all the teams down the bottom are winning every single game except us, even when they play each other - real 6 pointers 🙄

LWB but only off the bench, still has a RB starting ahead of him.

Definitely need to do some work on set pieces. Having looked really useful from them in the opening few games (particularly thinking of QPR when McFadz scored & we could have had many more), we don't truly look threatening from them at all anymore.

Not my stats but looks like it. Whoscored have him at 3, level with Sheaf. Worth noting, Tackle numbers are never as high as you might expect. James Garner was highest for the game with 4. League leader averages 3.1 per game.

I know he thought it was, doesn't mean he's right. Only 1 person is in line with it, he couldn't have been better placed & was absolutely adamant.

It was a shocking pass, Sheaf would have been slaughtered for it. That said, they didn't score direct from that as James commited a foul to allow us to regroup. That's why it's so disappointing for Pask to lose his man as it was a dead ball. I will continue to stick up for him though as he's...

Definitely better as a wing-back than in a back 4, indeed it's a better system for the whole team really.

Exactly. Yes, we've dropped some points but the way some carry on it's like all of the teams below us have suddenly become prime Barcelona. I refer you back to the beginning of the thread & some claiming they've been right all along. We were 6pts clear when this was posted 2 weeks ago &...

I'm assuming you mean the Rotherham one? The Norwich one was a howler by the ref who somehow failed to see him get both hands on the ball. If so, totally different, look at the way Wilson comes out, he doesn't get the ball, their player does & he studs him in the upper thigh.

Fair, but the question is who was available on a free in January that's: A) Better than what we have available B) On reasonable money C) Either good enough to be first choice even when Godden & Walker are fit or content to be 4th/5th choice?