Search results

Yes judgement will be known to the parties this week so maybe why the rent offer hasn't be commented on just yet?

CW will go. What then? Baker probably told he can go but no one will take him.

Not rules out I see.

Spot on post. Wilson will go and we need 10+ signings of experience and quality.

Very true it thought he looked a good player also but ultimately he failed and cost us a signing and a budget til he was got rid. He wasnt the right mentality and attitude. Add him to the other 3-4 strikers who flopped then signing 3 this summer doesn't look good. Also I am 90% sure Wilson...

You're possible right Robo but then in the letter it clearly states to waiting for the JR so why not offer it before the JR if it didn't matter? But then to offer it Inbetween trial and verdict seems a tad silly. Offer it before or after for me.

Now now. Only 8 players? I thought a team in football was 11. We need a whole new team with back up players. The squad last year was 5 good men short at least. What's worrying me the most is the strikers? How much trouble did we have with strikers last year and he wants 3 this year all...

I still don't know why this was offered now. It makes no sense to me. In the letter the reference is made to waiting for the JR to happen before making this offer but surely the results of the JR are more important and any offer such as this one is redundant til the results. I don't understand...

Obviously but what are the chances according to your offer. I would say less than 10%. This isn't me having a dig just me being realistic. Some people think it's a complete non starter. Is a response expected today then?

Any update micheal?

True. Michael I love what everyone is doing as anything to get Coventry back is a hero in my eyes but questions do need answering or else it's just another "sideshow" dare I ever quote ML again. Biggest questions for me are the money involved after 5k plus attendances as in what happens...

So all in all it's likely to be around 200k give or take to rent in Northampton where as Ricoh was 150k as per last offer and match day costs of 12k aporox per match. With this in mind Northampon makes no financial sense as we know and the numbers done to death. We all know why sisu are...

I haven't so hopefully I'm not an idiot.

"Its percieved we pay £150K. at Sixfields ,Labovitch would not confirm on CWR last night ." I guess it's probably 150k and inclusive of all costs but still not confirmed.

So does anyone know? Robo said they don't include match day costs and Nick said they do. 150k rent at Northampton I doubt includes match day fees but I could be wrong. I guess that's the problem that we don't know still after a year. Why can't sisu clarify this? (Not that it matters)

Post some proof please? Anyway that's 150k if it's true plus match days costs so what's different to here or the Ricoh? Bloody mindless really

Don't often agree NW but spot on here. The clubs owners are ultimately responsible for everything involving our club. People to blame many in fact including ACL and past owners and probably even the guy who use to place my bet at the main stand at HR. Sure he is at fault somehow but right now...

Micheal states still no reply. Micheal I know you are stating in every post our opinion matters nothing and I agree btw but by not hearing back from sisu there is a reason why? They are not interested. They think the offer is worthless. Sorry. I do applaud the offer though and more like...

Head on the nail. (Please re-arrange)

The business is worthless as it is loss making although attempts have been made to rectify that (sixfields and alienating 90% of the fan base aside) If at the Ricoh now on 150k rent as per last offer and with our wage bill around 1.5-2m then Coventry could even be making money right now...