Well I base my opinions of people/groups over a length of time. Sisu have been caught out lying more times than I care to remember.
For that they lose the right to benefit of the doubt.
My understanding is there is two aspects that sisu have claimed.
They claim public money has been used to undermine their business plan.
They also claim the loan the council made to acl wouldn't have been made by a commercial lender as they claim acl doesn't have the capital to warrant...
Who said anything about paying over the top?
I said make an offer that can't be refused. Present their vision of the Ricoh Arena under their ownership.
How it will benefit the club, how it will benefit the city of Coventry, because right now all we've heard is how it will benefit joy and...
I'd be interested to know how much match day costs are in Northampton.
Either way, the offer from acl would see the club far better off financially.
I think its time all fans united in pressuring the club into accepting this.
Really wish you would stop presenting opinion as fact.
You have nothing to support the "fact" that acl will go tits up. Much more likely is they will get a commercial loan in that unlikely event.
I can clear up the confusion now if you like. The freehold isn't for sale. That doesn't mean a good offer wouldn't be listened to though.
Just in the same way the club wasn't for sale when groups were interested.
What boycotting does do though is keep our plight in the minds of the media.
For instance if it wasn't for the sixfields boycott we wouldn't have had David Conns article. Without his article we may never have known about this rent free offer.