Search results

So nothing hypocritical in it at all then is there? Your agreeing that its two completely different scenarios?

Love it when people claim to be "balanced" or neutral". Everyone has an opinion on something like this, even the so called balanced ones. Nothing wrong with that of course, you would have to have the brain of a rotting cabbage to not have an opinion. Welcome Warwickshirelad.

I really don't think you understand. Its simple really: Set a club up in Feb 14 with the INTENTION (that is the key word) of kicking off in Aug 14. Send a letter to sisu stating that they get their arses back to Coventry by the start of the 14/15 season, otherwise this new club will be...

The only small benefit of owning the Freehold is that they wont have to renegotiate the Leasehold in 50-100 years. However that's still a pretty lame reason to own it. A bit like moving to the CO-OP in town purely because it saves you the trip to see Father Christmas once a year.

Because they care about getting CCFC back to Coventry.

I think when the OP refers to Coventry he's on about the city as a whole, not the club.

You dodged my question well there. Well done. Simple question to answer though (without referring to who said something nasty to someone else) Do you believe that we as individuals should follow our conscience and do what we individualy believe is right, or should we follow the majority...

Always someone else eh?

I thought we were all supposed to follow our conscience and do what we believed was right? Or does that only apply to those attending Sixfields?

Don't rise to him. He's still trying to argue that 42% is higher than 57%.

I'm in agreement with this now. I still think it should be used as a threat first, basically tell sisu, get your arses back to Coventry by the end of the season, or for 14/15 season we shall be paying to watch our own sky blues.

And the council had different leadership yet blame is still attributed to them.

In my opinion no side is blameless, but one has done far more wrong than the other. Starting back in 2003 I would say blame was 50/50, things that have happened since I would say have been more down to one side. Just my opinion.

So just to clarify, you apportion blame 50/50?

Think so.

Well I've no intention of supporting the suing of my city.

You want the council to be found guilty? You do realise how bad that would be for the city?

& 57.7% apportion no blame on the council. So much for the idea that most people blame both sides.

The highest ever in Sphinx's division was 1280 according to Wiki. Easy to beat!

If you ever read Paul Thompsons autobiography you get a real idea as to what was going on.