Search results

'Cos we don't have any wide men. I suppose there's an argument that he should have signed some, though.

That'll be the expectancy level going through the roof, then.

Shit management that, trying to pick your best team...

Thanks, he is, then!

Awww shite. Is McSheffrey coming on?

Is it still 1-1, or have they got another?

So much for us now having more height..

Balllllllssss!

I'd have loved it for us to have signed him.

SKY BLUE ARMY!!! Well it's one way to make work enjoyable I guess :)

Woooooooooooooooooooooooot!

Agreed, I think if they figure in the same side Sheff will be up front.

Yeah and he's a bit old for two games in a week. But you're right, he plays, no Baker!

Fleck for Sheff, otherwise unchanged then. Bit worried about Billy, hope he comes through it OK. I'm still a bit shocked that he's not a striker anymore, tbh. Does anyone know if he played deeper when at school? After all, Hall was a striker originally, hard as that is to believe! EDIT: just...

Hell, I predict one if we win 1-0 and are "unconvincing"! We already have one forum member who has said they'd sack Thorn next summer if we get promoted.

Or at least until about 4:50pm today, which is when I expect the forum to be innundated with "Thorn out" threads if we lose and tumbleweed if we win.

S'alright, rare indeed is the day where both England and City did well: I'm taking this as a sign that we're going to beat Yeovil!

They did for one of the pre-season games, dunno if they'll bother when there's other stuff going on.

My worry is a lack of fitness for him, Fleck and Barton if selected. It may well mean that Carl Baker has to carry the midfield today.

I don't think she'd like that...you could claim it's a birthday present?