Search results

They were being lumped in with Wycombe as an "easy game" pre-match 🙄

Who on our bench do you look at and think "He'll come on & win us the game" ?

Their available substitutes alone cost £50m+

Much easier when you're in front. The subs we used are excellent at helping protect a lead; Sheaf to put his foot on the ball, slow it down, retain possession, Baka to stretch them & prevent them playing out etc. They're not players likely to come on & win it for you though. I'd have brought...

We've got some really good options to help protect a lead imo but nobody to really change it in an attacking sense.

Because we don't really have anyone on the bench likely to change the game. Gyökeres at a push but this forum has already decided he's shit so 🤷🏼‍♂️

Ffs

One more foul & McNair could go

James is for Kelly hopefully, not been at his best tonight.

Yes, because his role is to get in behind them, that relies on us actually having the ball & getting it to him to do that. The target man role involves coming deep to link play, win flick ons etc. Your target man should always be one of the most involved players.

Daft foul Kelly, they'll punish us on one of these again

They've only been slightly better is the positive so far. We have been soooo sloppy though.

They play completely different roles, why can't people understand that? Do you want both of them nearer the halfway line than the 6 yard box?

Has to be a yellow that, rugby tackled Walker

How's that Hamer's foul!?!?

The opposite, they want him to stay here & learn to play out from the back in our system.

Their only 1 is the goal. Not the highest quality game.

The only difference would be the defenders know Marosi won't come so are more geared up to deal with it. Wilson came for it then retreated, cardinal sin for a keeper.

What the fuck has Warnock got to moan about? Refs done well.

Brilliant McCallum, goal saver. Rose beaten far too easily