Search results

Yes but ACL wont dissolve that's the problem isn't it. Do you think we should be back before the season starts on a low rental short term agreement or any other suggestion?

Its about what is fair and what is legally right and that's the way it is. We all agree the rent was too high and revenues should go to ccfc. (never saying this again) What level of rent is fair to you then? How much?

I agree with some of that yes but 2 questions for you? 1. Surely a rent reduction of 90% outweighs rights of match day income which we know to be worth not as much even though you have the same problem? 2. Why did TF and ML shake on 400k in January 2013 if 150k wasn't good enough? The point...

Yes we all agree Ian including ACL. things were changing. rent was shook on at 400k remember by TF so he saw nothing wrong with that. Why did Sisu turn down 150k for 10 years last year then? Why did Sisu turn down 150k for 10 years last year then? a 90% reduction in rent. Wouldn't of needed...

They will finally understand one day. I live in hope. Its just basic business and figures that you don't have to be Peter Jones to understand.

The CVA was rejected for many reasons all stated a million times and if you actually believe if acl would have accepted the cva we would be at the ricoh "some time ago" you really are naïve or struggling to come to terms with the judges verdict. Sisu were intent on not paying the rent and...

Fact 1 - the rent deal was to go back for arguments sake to 1.3 but in principal it would be "market rate" well below 1.3m you should know. Fact 2 - Of course it had no revenues as it was a 90% reduction on the rent. Is that not moving an inch?

2 facts Grendel. Fact 1. the rent deal was 400k for 3 years and didn't return to 1.3m as you wrongly suggest. Fact 2. ACL offered an even better 150k 10 year rent deal on the eve of liquation. Believe it or not to keep Coventry City in Coventry

ACL have offered numerous rent reductions so how is that not moving an inch? The judge has proved your beloved sisu wrong not me.

Really? I don't know but I didn't think they wouldn't speak to each other. That's the only way to sort this mess out.

I don't understand, what are you talking about?

Couldn't agree more. He was a good player for us hence moving on to better things but he is clueless about this situation. Its not about growing up and maturity. Its about a greedy hedgefund trying to rip off a local council/company and I quote "distress acl and legally stop paying rent to claim...

As Ann Lucas states this is all a complete waste of time and money. The only winners are the lawyers and we need a realistic way to get ccfc back home not this load of crap. They tried to get their investment back with a unbelievable move and it has failed badly so forget it and now come...

Yes possibly he could be but seems an out an out winger to me which is great but we need a playmaker a zidane of league 1 like moussa was. A man who would get double figures in goals and set up others also. A flare player that excites the fans.

Possibly. More than enough good strikers out there and we need a goalscoring midfielder also imo. A playmaker Franck Moussa player. We need this badly.

Doesn't sound like he has a list as such but we need them soonish as they need to settle and get use to playing our way. How does a Leroy Lita and a Tom Pope partnership sound?

http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport/football/football-news/coventry-city-boss-steven-pressley-7393289 Looks like SP wants 4 strikers with 1 being from the academy and I prefer James Maddison myself. He also wants a LB and players are shortlisted. Overall its encouraging but I still think...

Doesn't matter if true as 1m wont be paid as long as I have a hole in my arse.

Great work simon and ct. Ignore some stupid comments on here as I'm sure you do. Let's bring it home Saturday.

Fleck would be my shout. Young hungry Scottish. He is a definite winner.