Search results

According to Fisher he had been looking at a new ground before CCC lent Acl the money. Therefore he was negotiating with the council whilst also considering a new ground. Was he being underhand?

If we're into simplistic arguments like that then Higgs and CCC have played a blinder here. Today Higgs Vs Sisu: Higgs blame CCC, Higgs free from any accusations, no comeback on CCC as their not on trial. JR CCC Vs Sisu: CCC blame Higgs, CCC free from any accusations, no comeback on Higgs as...

Why wouldn't you? Northamptonshire isn't its broadcast area.

Yeah that's up there with the other sisu classic contradiction: Its illegal for two or more parties (CCC, ACL & Higgs) to conspire in distressing the business interests of a third party (Sisu/CCFC/Otium) Its legal for two or more parties (Sisu & CCC) to conspire in distressing the business...

Good report! So her position two years ago was the Ricoh or we're walking away? Yet now we're meant to believe that they will fund millions for a new stadium?

Its all about motives. That statement doesn't say their motive for lending the money was to force a club sale, it just says what might be an outcome of it. For the council to lend the money with the intention of getting rid of sisu is illegal. For the council to lend money that might...

Greenbelt land?

That's where I'm struggling to understand it then, as from what has been said, it sounds as though Sisu's defence is that Higgs knew of the alleged agreement between CCC and Sisu to distress YB. That however is a crucial part of the JR. If that cant be taken into account what other evidence can...

I'm still confused as to how the judge can rule on this without prejudicing the outcome of the JR.

I think he means if CCC suggested a site within the city for Sisu, it would once again expose Sisus real plan when they refused the councils offer.

They couldn't refuse planning permission for a legitimate planning application. The idea that they could is just something put out there by sisu backed lackeys to try and put pressure on the Council.

The trust just needs to come out and say that only it's member's can dictate a change of leadership, not an employee of sisu/otium.

You can only publically accuse someone of something (in this case saying something defamatory) if it has been proven in a court of law. Doing so otherwise is defamatory itself.

FA Cup final, Champions League final, or if anyone has a Brazilian contact how about the World Cup final?

I know a few Leicester fans and they all seem to prefer Filbert St to the Walkers. They seem more nostalgic about their old ground than us. Could only be the ones I know though.

Did I say it wouldn't?

I would like to point out cobblers that any bad feelings towards ntfc from us is aimed at your chairman, not the fans.

If we got back to the Ricoh I might try and forget what has happened for the sake of the team. But I will never forgive.

If we were to do anything like that I would like to see it over Wembley on cup final day. That would give maximum exposure.

Highfield Road 3.2 Miles Ricoh Arena 2.8 Miles