Search results

Double change - Palmer and Tavares for O’Hare and Allen.

Robins is also in the privileged position to be able to change it.

Massive fan of Robins but I also put the draw all on his shoulders. Needed changes far sooner. I don’t really rate Tavares but that was the game for him - drag their defence back a bit further.

Exactly. Don’t like Piers Morgan, aware he has a programme on Talk TV, choose not to watch it. Edit: might be GB News. Still.

I fall into this ballpark. Not really fussed by them enough to ‘pick a side’. They can do what they like. Just the fact that the narrative is “outsider comes in and steals unsuspecting prince” I find weird. Do we assume this because he’s now a mature man who doesn’t hop round dressed as a nazi?

Car tyres being so expensive. Got a puncture and everywhere seems to be wanting £150 for a Pirelli.

Boosh has taken it too far this time.

Part of it will be down to coaching ability. Past teams full of stars but with seemingly no plan to play to any of their strengths. He’s fortunate that a lot of the current Argentina players are basically workhorses who complement his style well. On face value, Lautaro Martinez should be ahead...

How does Peter Walton still get work?

Is there an alternative option of retaining Southgate but freshening up the coaching staff? Clearly from a motivational perspective Southgate is good and calms the players, you can see that from the environment created. A stronger tactician in the staff could be what is needed.

Maddison could have been the difference maker but given he’s not been involved in the squad prior to this tournament it was always an uphill battle. Think he could become more involved ahead of Euro 2024. Gallagher was a bizarre one. Coady I think was taken more for his cheerleading...

Netherlands play to a plan well. Not the great flowing football of time gone by but I fancy them to beat Argentina.

Bet Brazil wish they had Southgate in charge, only about 3 players back then when they were 1-0 up.

Who was it that said about our profit share of F&B not having been paid? Someone reported this a good while ago.

Can’t see it. No legal precedent for an appeal.

Basically this. It would have limited our liability on repairs/maintenance requirements given we have relatively modest usage. Also thinking SISU were planning to have taken over the stadium at this point, at which they could rescind the License and implement their own Lease terms.

Yes but the club have a License. Standard Lease protections don’t exist, hence this happening.

All stadia to be housed in CICs. 999 year leases agreed at a peppercorn rent. That could be governed by an external body.

It is mentioned in Gilbert’s tweet that the agreement CCFC has is a License, not a Lease. I believe we all understood it to be a Lease for which there are very specific rules of termination. A License can be terminated by the Licensor just because they fancy it.

License not Lease. Didn’t spot that previously. We’re in trouble.