Search results

But see the problem is, CCFC is either a cultural asset, or a private business. If its a cultural asset, CCC would be right to try and force an ownership change of CCFC if they thought it was in the interest of the city. Yet the mere suggestion on here that they were trying that resulted in...

Seems quite complementary of him.

Nothing to do with Sir Jack!

You know, when you throw personal insults around like that, it usually means you have no counter argument to what I posted. You disagree with me because you think you have to, but basically don't know why. When you resort to personal insults it only makes one person look bad, you. Decent...

Jeremy Thorpe was found innocent so surely a good thing?

In fairness I think Fisher's or Seppala's funeral would attract far more people than Sir Jack Heywood's did! I would be at the front of the queue just to make sure their dead. My mate is a Wolves fan, and I went with him to the game when they were holding tributes to him. It was very heart...

I never realised until lately how arrogant some CCFC fans are. Whoever has bestowed this award looks at all issues, not just things that affect a 3rd division football club. The world doesn't revolve around CCFC ffs. This award obviously has nothing whatsoever to do with the football club, more...

In which case the club is screwed.

Isn't that the same argument though as sticking with Presley? As far as I'm aware no one else has applied for the city job since Presley has been here, so that must mean no one is interested. If Presley gets the sack, we could be left with no manager.

But that's just another way of saying dying. Does it really matter anyway? I'm sure both of us have better things to do than discuss definitions of the English language.

Would you prefer it if I said dying then? How about nearly dead?

Oh good. Everything is hunky dory then.

That's what elections are for.

The biggest story out of this is only 21% of members could be arsed to vote. Can't help but think the club is dead.

But at the minute these aren't facts, they are allegations. There is a massive difference. Les Reid's articles have a tendency to make some pretty explosive allegations within the headline, then when you read the actual story there is nothing in it.

Your probably right with that. One game wont make any significant effect to the finances, and I am not sure it would grab the headlines the same way as if we were still in Northampton (national media have lost interest in us now). Long term low attendances are happening anyway without the need...

Yes I think that's reasonable. However when you look at the club without any emotion involved, only two scenarios can improve the current situation. Either a massive cash injection, or completely starting again and building the club up from scratch. At the minute we just seem to be hoping...

All of us want sisu out apparently so then it just comes down to the method. Some people see getting rid of them, at all costs, gives the club the best chance of survival. Those people want Sisu out because its best for the club, not because they hate sisu, which was the original point. Also I...

I certainly think its something worth looking at, don't you? Or do you think we should have a closed mind on such matters?