Search results

And what all the mess with the academy and stadium, probably the two most important things at a football club just goes away like that does it?

He's bidding for a football club but what he would be receiving is not a football club or at least not a working one. How is it not broken?

Isn't that what I just said in my last post? From there point it does make sense to sell the pieces individually. Because at the moment they don't have a football club to sell, it doesn't work. That doesn't make the hofman bid shit, derisory or whatever. He's bidding on a broken product.

If it was such and undervalued offer where is the line of buyers looking to outbid him and pick up a bargain.

Maybe from there point, they probably should. They will get more selling each part individually than as a whole package because at the moment the package doesn't work, no one is going to come and beat the offer from hofman and his group. From the noises coming out from the SISU camp it sounds...

Doesn't matter what they have to sell, it's useless without the whole package which they don't have

Haha good one

And a club without an academy base or stadium or long term tenancy agreement and a club which is losing money everyweek devalues it. Most people wouldn't buy a £20,000 asset at full price if you needed to put in another £100,000 just to make it in working order. It's like buying/selling the...

No because it's silly, did Hoffman make an offer to buy Stevenson?

Why don't you ask him that? i am just relaying what he said about the debt on his twitter.

Sounds like it was written by Fisher

Some people have been suckered right into the sisu/Les pr wagon here

Lol

Why is it a bad offer? Its more than any sane business person not influenced by emotion would ever offer for a club in this state

He says realistically SISU would have to to write off the debt

I agree it was likely never going to be accepted bit disagree that it was not a realistic offer. It's Sisu valuation that is unrealistic

They won't put money into the club if Sisu remain as owners. No you don't negate him as a threat, he was on the board before and left because he was trying to manoeuvre a takeover of the club. Lastly that doesn't answer the final question, why would Sisu let him drop the legal action? Only...

Why would Hoffman and whoever else is involved put money into the club without getting ownership? Why would Sisu appoint a CEO they know if actively trying to get rid of them? Why would SISU let him drop the legal action?

I don't get the opinion from some that robins doesn't fancy/rate DKE. I think he's just protecting a young and inexperienced players and easing him in slowly.

Ghadzhev was awful at the beginning of the season and hasn't really been given a look in since