Search results

Yeah, he was weak as piss. It was embarrassing.

I don't know why that wasn't a booking; clear and cynical foul. Not a red, though.

No We just need officials to be stronger with teams taking the piss.

A what, now?

Fair play. That's given me a proper laugh.

He won't if idiots keep giving him attention...

As have Wycombe.

This part at least is very true.

But why was he advancing out of his box; Kitching had it covered under no pressure. Collins charging out put doubt in his mind. It was a crazy misreading of the game.

If you don't pick Wilson over a broken Collins, why extend his contract? It's so weird.

It's not corruption. He didn't care if we or Burnley won that game. He was just bad at his job, which is also an extremely difficult job.

See thread title for explanation.

Thing is, regardless of what you might think of the keepers in terms of quality, Collins' confidence is shot. That affects his decision making, and you get things like today.

Other than gifting them the goal, in the first half, when Burnley weren't just trying to defend a lead, I thought it was a good, solid display.

MVE was very good, Dasilva was good, and I thought Thomas and Rudoni had a decent game, too.

Hopelessly out of his depth.

But that's the thing; they have nothing like the talent of Leeds or even Sheffield United, so they play like that. I mean it works, but god it's hard to watch.

That was my instinct. He came when he didn't need to and Kitching then didn't know what to do.

Aye, they won't get away with that against the better quality; teams will pick them open.

Some of the decision making and control in the final third was very poor. It's hard to know how critical you can be, though, this is a team that's conceded 12 all season. However you want top look at it, and however hard they are to watch, that's remarkable. They didn't deserve to win, but give...