Search results

If the club came back to the Ricoh talking about buying ACL like Wasps have you would possibly have a point. Unfortunately they came back for a stop gap whilst building a new stadium. Also they were asked two/three times to come with a sensible bid for ACL and they were given a deadline beyond...

I don't think anyone was told to keep it quite. They just did for a few days until one person mentioned it. Bit bizzare really. But hey ho each to their own.

I don't think you get what I am saying? For weeks I have said SISU should have bid high ( charity would have both a legal and moral obligation to accept the offer) To do this though SISU would need to bid significantly more than 2.77. Also prove you have the funds and you can pay in one go, so...

When I have I said that nobody had issues?

I have been saying for weeks its the angle SISU need to use. So you couldn't be more wrong in your flippant comment.

They said who they wanted to sell to so it was down to us to change their mind. By matching who they wanted to sell to was pointless. They have loads of reasons to discount a SISU bid. So we needed to offer more money, prove we have the funds and give them no choice. Once that was done then...

Need to look harder then.

I accept that because they said it. We needed to force them to accept the bid which we didn't

Every penny more for the charity is better. That's why I said bid significantly more. Also match anything offered by wasps ( which would have covered the 50p in the ticket price going to the charity ) There was only one shot at this matching the wasps offer and writing a page about community...

I take it that is a no and if so It was pointless spiel. Like I said should have bid significantly more and agreed to match whatever community stuff Wasps offered

So if the bid was accepted. Would CCFC be legally obliged to deliver on all of that?

Sounds like wasps fans are having a pop at the people who have been defending their honour like knights in shining armour. What a back stab!

Doesn't matter who is the receiver of the payments Waps have taken on around 14 million debt plus paying 6.5 million. You can't just ignore the 14 million and say they got all of ACL for 6.5 million.

Just quoting the facts you are leaving out. Spinning some may say is what you are doing? Roughly 20 million for ACL

Needed to far surpass the wasps offer IMO. Them also match anything offered by wasps. Pushing the charity to fulfil its legal obligation. Then once the offer was accepted it would have been down to the people of Coventry to apply pressure on Wasps. Matching wasps was never going to cut it...

How much do you think wasps are going to buy the charities shares for? Where did you get that figure from?

The plea needs to be made to Wasps As I have always said if SISU are serious they should bid very high. With proof of funds. so the Charity legally have to accept the offer. Make it as public as can be so a campaign starts. The campaign would be a swell of pressure on wasps not to veto so a...

I agree, his strength was not out and out scoring. Yet he was our top scorer. Which tells you a lot. You sell your top scorer when you are in a relegation battle for 1 million. When the relegation is going to cost you 5 million. There was something massively wrong a club. However I would say...

He had a lot of potential when he broke into the team. However Newcastle was a silly move for him, They should negotiated that we keep him on loan as part of the deal. He was nowhere near ready for the prem when he left. Juke he was our top scorer going into a relegation battle. Definitely...

So how much have SISU paid out on fees for this and the JR roughly?