Search results

Is that true? Chelsea are deliberately taking on every young player they can, paying low and lending for profit? Where did you get the information can you share?

Yes, really, I am serious. And playing at Nunny next season might well be the making of him. It's happened before and I reckon Thomas has better chance of a Phoenix moment than most.

It's the inevitable dichotomy. If we obtain a player and he's successful he'll be enticed elsewhere; if he's not then he's little use to us. I guess the ideal position for us is finding players that are only just good enough to fit in a successful side at this level: if Mowbray finds a player...

Don't write off Thomas yet. Personally I think it's a confidence thing with him. There are plenty of late developers in football. I'm not saying he's going to turn around this season or with us but I won't be surprised to see his name in the Premiership in three or so years time.

Maddison certainly looks like a crock. Look at his record over the past ten games.

I agree with that apart from the tongue in cheek 'cake walk' comment. If he's not the real deal I'll eat Paddy Ashdown's hat. We're only going to get till Summer with him, let's enjoy the moment and look forward to telling surprised friends in the future 'you know, he used to play for Cov'.

SISU are so obsessed with the pie money I don't know why they didn't just put a bit in for Greggs instead.

The online experience could be improved too. Once you've selected the game it doesn't show which game you are buying tickets for all the way through. I always double check when buying online - just putting the name of the game on the screen as you work through would be helpful.

Stokes doesn't seem very happy about the third goal.

If you look at the third goal, Vincelot is there again bombing in for the rebound. Great attitude and he'll score a few that way over the season.

Are you a Bond villain?

I hope he's wrong.

I'm not going to claim that Dickens was 'the first modern novelist' or anything pretentious like that. Firstly because I'm not even sure what that means and secondly because I'm sure there are people on this forum who know far more about literature than I do and will dispute the claim; I'm sure...

Crikey you are right - just checked their discography. Are the later albums any good, as I do like some Yes.

We'll have to agree to differ - sorry I don't get rap. I listened to this track and to my uninitiated ear it does sound like mediocre music with someone talking over the top.

Too bad ;)

Yes we're killed by punk. They managed just 'going for the one' and 'tormado' (sp?) of even remote quality and to be honest they'd probably already recorded the former when punk exploded into the scene. Marillion I have no idea about, never heard any as I imagine it's not my cup of tea. Did...

Prodigy maybe?

Rap is just talking over no musical innovation IMO so that wouldn't make it. I agree with Donna Summer over the Jacksons. The point with Nirvana is the size of the sound. Hendrix was brilliant but it was really just the blues and didn't have the depth of sound that thrash has. Also Nirvana...

And to steal your thread, in similar circumstances, what would you play to John Lydon in 1977?