Search results

  1. oldskyblue58

    TF explains how ........

    latest report regarding new stadium build ..... http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport/football/football-news/sky-blues-chief-tim-fisher-4065237 That would be Lionel Road IN Brentford would it ? and Brentford who have a ground to sell A new stadium financed by other development that...
  2. oldskyblue58

    Forum Questions that could be asked

    I know most of the questions will not be able to be asked and if asked will be side stepped but you never know some might get through...... The important ones to summarise What is the nature/trade/status of CCFC ltd and from when exactly How long exactly have the accounts been wrong and if...
  3. oldskyblue58

    Forum Questions that could be asked

    Just some thoughts that i hope might help question TF. These are only some The Status of CCFC Ltd - The accounts to 31/05/11 signed by you state that CCFC ltd operates the football team. You have stated it is actually a non trading property subsidiary and more recently a non trading property...
  4. oldskyblue58

    CCLSC minutes 29th May - Fisher Speaks

    not normal at all highly unusual .............. but to get the current figures right they will have to work on previous years because of the balances that roll forward each year...... that is if the basis is wrong
  5. oldskyblue58

    CCLSC minutes 29th May - Fisher Speaks

    Yes there is a mechanism for correcting accounts at Company House
  6. oldskyblue58

    CCLSC minutes 29th May - Fisher Speaks

    Will try to get to one of them yes but if not will post some questions
  7. oldskyblue58

    CCLSC minutes 29th May - Fisher Speaks

    Not sure i would want to be their auditors apparently the audit will take 10 days per TF .......... Well if the accounts prepared for the group on the same basis as those to 2011 given the staff BDO have yes that could be done But TF repeatedly has said the accounts are wrong...
  8. oldskyblue58

    CCLSC minutes 29th May - Fisher Speaks

    "Holdings is solvent; Limited is not" For reasons that are essentially two sides of the same coin ......... basically SISU chose to fund CCFC H but not CCFC Ltd............... what happens if they choose to not fund CCFC H ? 2011 accounts Holdings had current liabilities of £48m and losses...
  9. oldskyblue58

    We need an public debate with all stakeholders.

    The Charity, ACL and Council are all respondents in the Judicial Review and for legal reasons there would be a lot of things they could not answer. Whereas TF would not be so restricted he could say what he likes, ask questions he knows the other side cant answer because of the JR etc . I would...
  10. oldskyblue58

    That CCFC happy feeling........

    Just watching Premiership years 97/98 City beat Man Utd 3 :2 the third goal by Darren Huckerby was as good as anything you might see. First time in a very long time I have had a broad grin on my face about anything Sky Blue! Happy days and memories
  11. oldskyblue58

    So CCFC Ltd is a non trading property subsidiary .......

    There is a third option to my OP that I have thought about .... That the accounts are right up to 2011 or even 2012 (as the drafts produced by TF to the administrator indicate) and the trade is currently in CCFC H for the financial year 2013. This is not of course the argument that has ever...
  12. oldskyblue58

    So CCFC Ltd is a non trading property subsidiary .......

    company house guidance on filing revised accounts ........ might be useful for TF & co http://www.companieshouse.gov.uk/infoAndGuide/faq/amendingAccounts.shtml doesnt say anything about action that could be taken against directors etc
  13. oldskyblue58

    So CCFC Ltd is a non trading property subsidiary .......

    Grant Thornton up to and including 2007 accounts then BDO Stoy Hayward since. Would they both have not spotted something so fundamental to their report ? Also the responsibility to prepare accounts and file accounts that are true and fair is the Directors not the auditors.
  14. oldskyblue58

    So CCFC Ltd is a non trading property subsidiary .......

    was told that landlords are obliged to mitigate their claim and therefore it wouldnt be the full 42 years. No info as to what it would be "post 31" is just proposing what I think is the SISU plan. Of course if they maintain that the accounts are prepared on the wrong basis then the 75%...
  15. oldskyblue58

    So CCFC Ltd is a non trading property subsidiary .......

    not an insolvency expert but ..... ACL have registered a claim for all they are due under the lease past and future CCFC Ltd enters a CVA that pays a few pennies in the £ to settle all debts....... that pays the lease up............ with SISU as the buyers SISU then amalgamate the two...
  16. oldskyblue58

    confused about pitch

    Can hardly market it or even let CCFC back in if it isnt fit for purpose If they left it in the state it was TF would no doubt be saying we can't play there because it isnt fit to play on............ kind of takes that argument out of the equation if the pitch is looked after properly Just...
  17. oldskyblue58

    So CCFC Ltd is a non trading property subsidiary .......

    i agree ...... its just another red herring thats been thrown in to try prove rights to continue trading as a football club without the golden share
  18. oldskyblue58

    So CCFC Ltd is a non trading property subsidiary .......

    I didnt say CCFCH had the share (FL have confirmed that ccfc ltd did) I said CCFC H operated the trade of a football club according to TF. The rights attached to the share are still in CCFC Ltd to bid for A prospective buyer will certainly have to negotiate with SISU for the infrastructure of...
  19. oldskyblue58

    So CCFC Ltd is a non trading property subsidiary .......

    Arvo wont have paid money direct to CCFC Ltd...... their action is based on their charge over both companies that secured monies paid to the whole group. As such as it is a legal charge then there is no necessity to have provided funds to CCFC Ltd because it is legal for CCFC H or SBS&L to...
  20. oldskyblue58

    So CCFC Ltd is a non trading property subsidiary .......

    just for you _brian_ the accounting facts are either the accounts are right and ccfc ltd owe £60m to CCFCH & SBSL or the accounts are wrong because all the football trade is done by CCFC H and CCFC Ltd does not owe anything like (or even anything at all) that amount to CCFC H & SBSL...
Top