Search results

It’s on iFollow abroad so you just need to use a VPN.

It’s probably outside iFollow’s terms of use but that’s a very different thing to being illegal.

It shows how much the club has improved recently if this is the most important thing left to complain about.

That’s not the proper cup though ;-)

I’ve no idea what he’s worth, but to be honest it doesn’t matter. If West Ham (or other PL team) want him badly enough, we’re not going to get him. MacAnthony clearly thinks he’s going to the PL. But yes, watching them on Tuesday they definitely have a lot of good young players, playing a style...

Well we certainly beat Macclesfield 7-0 in the third round, can’t remember us having any bigger scores than that in the cup.

Of course you can watch it on iFollow

West Ham were bidding for Edwards in the January window (according to MacAnthony), we’re going to struggle to compete with them if they renew their interest.

Probably because there are two teams involved and it’s not all about us. I’m sure the EFL didn’t even consider it, but if they had, why would Preston agree to a midweek game rather playing it at the weekend? That would mean them having a 4 day gap followed by a 10 day gap (rather than 6 and 8)...

Your implication was that we have only agreed a deal for him, i.e. not signed him, and that it mattered that we hadn’t paid for him. Which it doesn’t. Yes, fair cop on irrelevant.

We have signed EMC, not “agreed a deal” for him. He is our player. It doesn’t matter that we haven’t paid for him yet, that’s not irrelevant.

MacAnthony said there was an option.

Well this final will be at the start of April so not sure it makes much difference. It’s a different matter if they make the playoff final though.

DMc said he’d given Doug first option on one of their players. I assume all that means is that he’ll advise us if any bids are made and give us the option of matching it or beating it. From what he said on his podcast he clearly likes doing business with us.

And I hope Burrows is the other player we’ve got an option on…

He’s been impressive, great touch and awareness. He’s going to fit in very well, Peterborough’s style is very similar to us. Great pass earlier off the outside of his right foot to split the defence and create another great chance.

Why would anybody think he was an O’Hare replacement?

Forest appear to have admitted the breach but said they would have been compliant if they had sold Brennan before June 30th, the cutoff date. The reality is they sold him in September, so it’s months rather than hours. If the PL allow that as mitigation then they will create a massive loophole...

It should be the same as Everton (10?), it’s reported as the same breach.

Maybe because it’s already in place, it works and doesn’t require any additional admin work to be done by the club to set it up?