Search results

Every Govt is.

That's not what NATO, UK and US Govts say. America owns the weapons and are responsible for their maintenance etc. the nuclear non-proliferation makes this clear.

Hasn't worked in Hungary because the cost of living is so much higher in relation to wages plus only just come out of double digit inflation.

No the question is if everyone is doing the same what changes the current economic status quo? Green energy has become a must because so many of our biggest trade partners are doing it.

But we are sending "him" around a billion dollars for 12 nuclear bombers - that aren't actually nuclear bombers unless the US President says the nuclear bombs can be used as he owns the bombs. Knee jerk nonsense.

Much depends on the weighting given to the different causes of a low birth rate - not just the economic but the social as well. You can address the economic easier than you can the social.

Politicians don't want a detailed conversation because then they'd have to detail the economics of it and they can't properly provide definitive answers past short-term results. Migration into a stagant economy is completely different to migration into a growth economy. It's like the green...

No. NYC is a special case. Plus his opponent wasn't popular with many for lots of reasons. It's still part a state where progressives have done well. What happens in New York rarely reflects onto the National scene.

There's nothing stopping members moving to other groups with the same stated end goals but don't advocate direct action/breaking the law. Their right to protest isn't being removed - just the methods

You can extend this to some of the freedom of expression legislation that has seen authorities go too far.

Not just us I think all Test sides wold have tried to grind a draw. Key concern is still how we bowled to their top order.

Their councils will be under a lot of scrutiny to see how they perform. If they are no worse than others that's still a plus for them. If they can make local Govt work then national floating voters could look at them in a different light.

There's always the 3rd option that Labour make a complete mess of it and much like the last election Reform could get in by default (particularly if the Tories can't reconnect with their former voters)

5 years ago sides would have been looking how to survive for a day and a bit rather than consider chasing a win

Ridiculous that chasing 371 looked fairly straightforward.That said India will be looking at their collapses in both innings as well as dropped catches

Often a correlation between how voters feel financially (normally the main issue in any election) and issues like immigration. If they're doing well, economy is doing well etc then immigration slides down the list of priorities. The opposite then immigration rises in the list of priorities -...

Don't have to do anything silly. It's under 3 per over (depending on the weather). Brook's was a silly dismissal rather than a particularly good ball.

Duckett epitomises the change in Test Cricket with a reverse sweep 6 off Jadeja on day 5 of a Test. One of the good things this "whiteball" approach to Test cricket has brought about is that teams can't just plonk a spinner on to stifle runs by bowling an unadventurous line.

Check my very first post on this thread from 5 years ago :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Given themselves a real chance here. Seen off the new ball without losing any wickets and a decent RR. As long as Jadeja doesn't start finding extra turn a win has to be possible (if no weather)