Search results

Your opinion

That’s part of the inconsistency of the defence and mitigation and the appeal She’s really suffered losing her child and understands how those affected feel so didn’t empathise but sought to inflame the situation and cause more distress and fear

Agree with all of that The transcript makes it clear why the lowest level is 3 years

Ok yep the hang em flog em brigade whataboutery. How do you manage that person. You’ve no idea have you

And …….. This was an appeal on the grounds she was mis advised by her solicitor she wasn’t It was found incredible that an intelligent lady who articulated her case well would have not understood the waiver she signed and claimed her solicitor didn’t give her the appropriate advice Looks...

Pretty sure I stand by all I said about risk and how this is managed when someone is in prison for I think 55 years. Think I was suggesting it was inhuman not to give him access to a hot drink James timpson has already ensured kitchens like that one are not allowed for that sort of prisoner...

Sentencing guidelines were updated in 2020 too

Why? Point them out and I’m happy to explain myself

Love it I’m not willing to read 13 pages that answers all the questions I’m raising just in case I look like a prick Jog on

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Lucy-Connolly-v-The-King.pdf

I value your opinion and you but please read the transcript and then come back and debate You’re better than the current comments

Read the transcript and then come back on and comment on the facts not your prejudice

How?? Please read the judgement and then come back and explain how this is on the government in any way

Wow The transcript is really eye opening The appeal is that the solicitor misled her which is utterly rejected They found Lucy Connolly evidence on the important matters to be incredible. Hugely badly informed and an eye opener for anyone else who thinks they can publicly say what they...

Yep agreed Cause very few ‘middle class’ people ever have any experience of court or the law lots seems contradictory or out of date or unfair

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Lucy-Connolly-v-The-King.pdf

Interesting comment the three judges said the sentence wasn’t manifestly wrong and … "was substantially based on a version of events put forward by the applicant which we have rejected".

Again I think the point is correct the sentences are incomparable for the action but that doesn’t take into account what was happening or what Lucy Connolly was advised to plead guilty too on a Facebook group someone said they’d read that 30000 current prisoners were guilty of social media...

Truth

That’s true and I think right Which surprises me again what the appeal was and on what ground was it refused