Shannerz
Fan Favourite
- Joined
- May 9, 2021
- Messages
- 3,906
- Reaction score
- 6,890
In the context it was used in the OP. But yes, moot.But that’s what jury’s out means? In being pedantic here so whatever.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In the context it was used in the OP. But yes, moot.But that’s what jury’s out means? In being pedantic here so whatever.
As it would be after two games for any player everJury still very much out.
to be pedantic doesn't the jury being out mean they're gone out of the court room to make their judgementBut that’s what jury’s out means? In being pedantic here so whatever.
No player should be judged by the value parties independent of the player decided to pay for his registration, it is illogical.His price tag will play a part in how he's viewed, and it should be, but that has to be when he's had enough of a chance to prove himself.
This thread, or at least how it's been couched, is ridiculous.
It might not be as simple but sakamoto is a fans favourite and that will certainly sway opinionNo I agree, hence why I think he’s lumped in with the aforementioned players and not the likes of Hamer and Pinnock where expectations are lower. He’s also the only one of those who has played at this level to not particularly great reviews so people’s expectations are less likely to give him the benefit of the doubt.
I’m not saying judge him. I’m saying it’s not as simple as “he’s taken Sakamoto’s place”. There’s a few things that mean people will give him less leeway than our other signings.
to be pedantic doesn't the jury being out mean they're gone out of the court room to make their judgement
Surely in this analogy the trial has only just started and they're still hearing evidence.
It might not be as simple but sakamoto is a fans favourite and that will certainly sway opinion
If a player is decent, but cost a fortune, does that not count against value for money?No player should be judged by the value parties independent of the player decided to pay for his registration, it is illogical.
If a player is decent, but cost a fortune, does that not count against value for money?
'They're good, but we over-paid', could be a valid statement.
BIt simplistic that is , sakamoto is cult hero like fan favourite.Grimes and FTT are fans favourites. Bobby Thomas is a fans favourite. EMC is a fans favourite. The only signings not replacing fans favourites are Rushworth and Awoniyi.
I don't think 'he looks decent enough but Grimes clearly isn't up to The Prem and BTA is terrible' (which i reckon will be a realistic opinion in 10 games or so) should be used against the individual tbh, i think its ridiculous. Moan about how the club spent it for sure, i have my own issues with that honestly.It an opportunity cost argument right? “He’s good but could we have spent less on a player just as good and had enough to sign a CM/LB/LW?” Which again I think is context working against him. If we didn’t have perceived holes in the squad there would be less scrutiny on the big money signings.
BIt simplistic that is , sakamoto is cult hero like fan favourite.
Closest thing we have to Hamer since Hamer left, in that regard imo.BIt simplistic that is , sakamoto is cult hero like fan favourite.
Possibly , many admitted that scott parkers defensive style played a part .. and weve been quite slow ponderous and negative first 2 gamesI mean I’m arguing sat in my Sakamoto t-shirt so I’m going to concede this. I do think though that the reviews from Burnley fans and others who watched him last year are the biggest factor.
Hamer got the baton from Biamou.Closest thing we have to Hamer since Hamer left, in that regard imo.
Hamer and Sakamoto have actually been good for us of course, Biamou sits more with Ben Wilson where in certain fans minds the ability is about 200x the reality.Hamer got the baton from Biamou.
Again, probably true, but too early for these discussions.It an opportunity cost argument right? “He’s good but could we have spent less on a player just as good and had enough to sign a CM/LB/LW?” Which again I think is context working against him. If we didn’t have perceived holes in the squad there would be less scrutiny on the big money signings.
Possibly , many admitted that scott parkers defensive style played a part .. and weve been quite slow ponderous and negative first 2 games
BTAs value will never be higher than the summer just gone and in hindsight he should have been moved on. I feel like some of the failure in the market sits with King but this one probably falls on Lampard. BTA was a player he mentioned regularly as deserving a chance. Hopefully he proves everyone wrong but he looks way out of his depth.BTA is the one we should be talking about here and what does he offer. Clearly dodging a bullet due to the hysteria based around signings of 20 million plus. Sherriff will be the one with a target on his back. It is just pathetic really
He was excellent against monaco where we played positive foorballHe’s also 22 and is closing in on 100 top-flight appearances across 3 countries. I like the look of him personally, bit of work to do but you accept that given his age.
Hamer and Sakamoto have actually been good for us of course, Biamou sits more with Ben Wilson where in certain fans minds the ability is about 200x the reality.
only the most deluded think Biamou was a great player lolHamer and Sakamoto have actually been good for us of course, Biamou sits more with Ben Wilson where in certain fans minds the ability is about 200x the reality.
He was excellent against monaco where we played positive foorball
Yeah there's no way we've paid £20M upfront. Part of that probably includes staying up this season, him scoring a certain number of goals, apparences etc.For £12m we supposedly paid upfront I dont mind him. He looks as if he would be useful at this level, people probably more critical due to the fabrizio price mentioned and the fact we are short elsewhere.
"Have we put £20m in the bin on Tchaouna?"
Because an 8-page thread with this as the header is really going to motivate a player who has just arrived isn't it?
You can't fix stupid.
The trouble is even though £20 million is a lot for us its just a drop in the ocean for most prem teams who spend more than that on development playersIt’s because he cost £20m let’s be honest here. Cherif is only escaping it because the jury is out while he’s unfit. Amanda has been class. Yirenkyi is splitting opinions a bit but not as much. There’s a lot of pressure on our big money signings.
Thread closed!No , hes a good player